IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated: 2nd day 0f Nevember ' ..
Present
I-ION'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.Q()PAIA' .
And % &
HON'BLE Mrs.JUSTIC~}'~E_ B_.y.NAG{ ii
WRIT APPEAL No.1 752%/2:398'
MBNEMANNA GOWDA
@MVMANMA'I'HA : -
S/OM.R.
AGED ABOUT 56 YE-ARs2":f ~ ~ .
R/O MAREBYLU 5
G. AGRAHARAVILI..A.GE- "
GONIBEEDU pos*:"',--._ '1: "
MUDIGERE TALUK_ _ _'
CHIKMAGALUR DES'I'RICT "~._ ' * . APPELLANT
(By Sn' A.G.SHfVANNA._ Abvf FLOR'
M/S.A_ Q sHIv=m§:N.A.,a: ASSOCIATES, ADVS}
.....
1 ‘ ~STA_TE’OF”KAI?NA’.T?AI{A
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE Govri,
REVENUE DEE-‘ARTMENT
. M.s.EU1LDIz\2Gs
u__B;_:NGALURU–56o 001
I V.I T£1ELA3sIsTANT COMMISSIONER
” [ CHIKMAGALUR SUB-DIVISION
* CHIKMAGALUR
2
3 THE ASST CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
MUDIGERE SUB–DIVISION
MUDIGERE .
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT 4 THE TAHSILDAR MUDIGERE TALUK MUDIGERE CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT .0 at
(By Si\/IT.A.D.\/IJAYA, AGA.)i
-000-
W.A is filed u/5.4 of the Karnataka. Act”
against the order dated 22-10–200″i’._passed”in _Writ} Petition
N0. 16252/2007 V ‘
This WA coming on fotrth .A’_’.:’12ief0re the Court
this day, Gopala Gowda, J :de’1ive:red.the f0110″w’1ng:–
. . ‘ . .. ” N T
This appteaiis sea gigéiireiét order dated 22/10/2007
passed byjthe iearned single Judge dismissing the writ
petition the appellant herein has sought
for Efgd’0rsement dated 10-9-2007 issued by the
;i’ahsi1daf”*-refiiisinlg to enter katha in his him in respect of
nm04sy;1\fo.77, 78 and 79 of G.Agrahara village since
‘isin’ithe name of Forest Department.
\\\«/
3
2. The grievance of the appellant is that he has been
registered as an occupant of the lands in question under
Section 9 of Karnataka (Personal and Miscellaneous).p*Ina1ns
Abolition Act by the Deputy Commissioner Vide
20-3-1975. By mistake, the Deputy
transferred these lands to Forest Dep;§rt1fi ¢n%.
lands.
3. There is delay of appeal.
Accepting the reasons state_d,”‘2009, the
same is allowed ar1d_ tlfjgefl this appeal is
condoned. — ‘
4. Since theV_dmatter”‘can. be disposed of on a short point.
€earned”dvrf.§0Vernment Advocate, Smt.A.D.Vijaya is directed to
ta}§e._ of respondents.
It that as per AnneXure–N dated 7-5-2007
“”d.-Ti,produnced dd along with the writ petition, the Deputy
C’ornrrIi-ssioner directed th Tahsildar to conduct enquiry in
7. Aecordingiy, the writ appeal is disposed of qua-shing
the order of learned single Judge and the writ
stands disposed of with the above directions.
8. The Govt.Advocate is permit.ted;1-ts.:’fitle_1he§*’
appearance in three Weeks.
T? ls”~3UDGE
IUDaE
MP/ck