High Court Karnataka High Court

M Chikkamadappa vs State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
M Chikkamadappa vs State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2010
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE 
DATED THIS THE 25"" DAY OF' JANUARY 2010
BEFORE

THE HONBLE2 MR. JUSTICE ASHOE _I-§IN'C'I91IG'§RI  <

WRIT PETITION NOS.1441w1444 oI:f.420:;I0..£1KL:2_§L.GI-   7

BETWEEN

1 .

SR1 M CI-IIKKAMADAPPA
s/0 MADAIAII I 

AGED 63 YEARS   ;  .
R/O 270, 7TH MAIN, SRINAGAR  
BANGALORE 560 050   _  '

SR1 B M cHENN,APIEA-' . .    E'   
S/OMUNISWE{E\'i.fi\Pp13i":'_V  =   »
AGED 55 YEARS-ii__  " '   I  

R /0 EAG.A~I,--UR, 'EAN'c3_._ALoRE_ NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE. _  '1 --  -

SR1 K.M.R;'~IgRIsII§AT'  
s/0 K M MU"M.1YI»',.PPA_ '
AGED 58,YEARE~.. '

4_ .. ..MALUR§CVILLAGE SII) LAGHATTA ROAD
 KOLAR DISTRICT "

'SRITE NA.   " 

s/0 G.IIIRUs'v;IAIAY' RAJU
AGED 63 YEARS

 R/O N"o.2~7, v1'sHwEsI»IwAI-
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 1
BANGALORE.

3. THE TAHSILDAR
MAOADI TALUK. MAGADI  =   
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.     RESPONDENTS

(BY:SRI R.OMI~:UMAR;L'A.G--.A_I}*  %

THESE WRIT P iITITIONS1ARE.fEILED'IIINDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE OONSTI'TI_JI*:ON'OE INDLA PRAYINO TO DIRECT
THE RESPONDENTS 1.,--AI*--§:D" 2 TO RECONSIDER
AND RENEW  T"HE1R:;,__ _ DEC.I_STOI\I.___ AS TAKEN UNDER
CORRESPONDENCE ~.r§.A'TE';D' 28132007 AS PER ANNEXURES IN
THE LIGHT OF R'EPRESfEN"1iA'rILO:-IS 'OF THESE PETITIONERS
DATED 23.2.2003 A2\ID'2,14.-2008---.AS«PER ANNEXURES S3 AND S2
KEEPING IN VIEWOVF vOR1)EPP;'\SSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT

IN W.P.NO. @5882/200_7"DATED 15.2.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE-Q

AN;)»§;Tc_    _____ 

 ~p'ET1TI'O--NS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

 HEARINGTFHAIAS-.D'A¥, .THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

VeR.O1’T-flcumar. the learned Additionai Government

directed to take notfice for the respondent

A V V E: to’ :3.

to

2. The petitioners are all the exwservicemen. They have

filed the applications for the grant. of land tinder’-l:.fi;h;’e.v”

Karna.tal<a Land Grant Rules. 1969. Though 10% V'

available for disposal in any village has to be re'serye'd:jfor vthe

exwservicemen and soldiers, they are not-._yet grar1ted"t._h~evv"

lands. In this regard, they the

representations at Annexures-'Sal to«..S3;A V

3. These petitions are the second
respondent Deputy” petitioners’
applications for with law and

in particular Rule 5 Grant Rules.
1969. within three montlisrtron’:V”theAl.da£%;…r.l61:’production of the
certified copy otf._%gtoday~;5 A. before the Deputy

Commissioner, . A ‘

allowed accordingly. No order

Sd/~*
IUDGE

VGR l