TUMKUR. é
Its: THE HIGH mum" er KARNATAKA. BAMSALQRE %
{DATED THIS me 25*" DAY er: AUGUST 2003 ; "
BEFQRE A % %
THE HON'fiLE MR; 3:_Jsr1c£ ASHGEL' s"'t~:14:~;crs;:G,E:>:i?kL*
wan" Pemmn N0.4?99 or 21cr.c1L6§*:;.:V;~;;m;=c:'- ~ , , " A T
BETWEEN %
M Gi.}NDL¥RAO 5,/0 LATE KR£S!~§NAS\!£!A§{§Y. VfA'
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, V % ; ~ .' . %
wumcme AT mop CORPORATIITRN' or -_ *
INDIA, pxsragcr omcs, PRESTIGE. V
cempmx, RAMASWAMY CIRCLE;-'~ 1
MYSORE 24 ~ .
%%%% « mmgm
(av sfisukgsiis;iA§y%VjEe§'@é; s.gAo 8: RM) Assoczmzs)
''"'-'''D A' u : %
smf VASA , EBA W/Q M"€3Qf*§ DUi:1AQ
WQRKING V;-.3AVwA BANK," """
BUGUf)N.'\EAfiALL'E akmcfi,
?uMK.tJR~V01§Tre:g _ 5,,
_ RESPONDENT
H %.AV(£n£r SR} G VEQAWASACHAR, ADV)
4. ” ” «THE’3..WRIT PETITIQN IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
‘QfF<THE_CQNS1'ITU?IGN GF INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE IMPUGNED
QT.' 21.3.2006 PASSED BY THE LEARNED FIRET ADDITIONAL
JUEIGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE ON I.A.N0.12 AN9 13 IN
M.C.¥'¥Q-.*'T1403/2001 VIDE ANXg M AND TEEREBY ALLOW THE SAID
V }"APPLlCATION AND RECALL THE ORDER DT. 13.2086 IN SO FAR
"–REU5\'T'ING YO STRIKING OFF THE DEFENCE OF THE PETITIONER
i*f_EREEM AND ALL PURSUANT ORDERS': AND ETC.
IT-'iiinnov i it
10. If the petitioner compiles with my cond.ii.ioi1éi’.vo’rtié;~nA
by depositing the amounts, the same ;ioes_¢not’ifio’a::§’jV»tiia:t’_”:the:_V RV’
petitioner is at liberty to protract thev;’pro:eei’dirig$_;”
petitioner and respondent shali co-opogateiiwitiij thVe”i?’ot’s5sr;:’i’i’;,i..Court * L’
in the eariy disposal of the matter.
11. I also deem it necossafl to’diroot’*ttio’_’€amiiy Court to
dispose of the main:..n*:otter the date of
receiiat of the certifiod. It is made deer
that, if at ail the case woré’to”bo5.;feoi?oh@»..V.it is on the
petitioner complying with thoicondiitioosnwfiaposngd».fioroin.
12. The petition’i:3’aiio\~eci in order as to costs.
Sd/-_-‘
Iudgé