High Court Kerala High Court

M.K.Govindankutty Nair vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
M.K.Govindankutty Nair vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34585 of 2009(P)


1. M.K.GOVINDANKUTTY NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE COMMANDANT, MALABAR SPECIAL

4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E),

                For Petitioner  :SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :02/12/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
              --------------------------------------------------
                 W.P.(C) NO.34585 OF 2009 (P)
              --------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

Petitioner retired on 30.6.1989 as Armed Police Inspector,

Malabar Special Police, Malappuram. The name of his wife Smt. K.P.

Padmavathy Amma was entered in the service records for family

pension. It is stated that subsequent to his retirement, the marriage

was dissolved as per judgment dated 19.12.1995 render by the

Sub Court, Ottappalam in O.P.No.40/1995.

2. Thereafter, the petitioner got married one Smt. V.

Padmavathy Amma. Later on 7.8.1998 he made Ext.P3 application

to the 2nd respondent to accord sanction for incorporating the name

of Smt. V. Padmavathy Amma for family pension. Though

supporting documents were also produced, still final orders on

Ext.P3 have not been passed and therefore this writ petition is

filed.

3. If as stated by the petitioner, he has filed a proper request,

Ext.P3, before the 2nd respondent for incorporation of the name

his 2nd wife for family pension, there is no reason why the said

WPC.No.34585 /09
:2 :

request shall not be considered.

4. Having regard to the above, I direct the 2nd respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible

and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a

copy of the judgment.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a

copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for

compliance.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/

WPC.No.34585 /09
:3 :