M.K.Saseendran vs M/S.Dredging Corporation Of … on 18 June, 2007

0
45
Kerala High Court
M.K.Saseendran vs M/S.Dredging Corporation Of … on 18 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 823 of 2003()


1. M.K.SASEENDRAN, S/O.LATE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M/S.DREDGING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PROJECT-IN-CHARGE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR, ADDL.CGSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :18/06/2007

 O R D E R
         K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ.

         ===============================

                           W.A. NO. 823 OF 2003

                  ======================

                Dated this the 18th day of June, 2007


                               J U D G M E N T

Radhakrishnan, J.

Original petition was preferred by the appellant herein

seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to pay

arrears of Conveyance Reimbursement, Canteen Subsidy and

Children Education Allowance of the period from 1.2.1998 to

30.11.2000 i.e. the period the petitioner was in service of the first

respondent and to declare para 17.2 of Ext.P3 as against the

provisions of Constitution of India. Learned Single Judge find no

reason to grant the relief as prayed after taking note of the fact

that the issue has been already settled vide Exhibit RIV

settlement. The settlement binds all the workmen including the

petitioner in terms of Section 2(p) of the Industrial Disputes Act

and Section 18(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, irrespective of

the fact that whether their union is a party to the settlement or

whether they are members of the union which entered into the

settlement. There is a specific clause 4.4 of Ext.RIV saying that

WA 823/2003

: 2 :

employees who took voluntary retirement/resigned between

1.2.98 and 28.10.2001 will not be eligible for allowances like

Conveyance Reimbursement/Transport Subsidy, Canteen Subsidy,

Children Education Allowance, Washing allowance, Lunch

Allowance to Drivers etc. Petitioner is therefore not eligible for

such allowances. Learned Single Judge therefore rightly

dismissed the original petition. Appeal lacks merits. Dismissed.

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here