High Court Kerala High Court

M.K.Ushadevi vs The Land Revenue Commissioner on 13 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
M.K.Ushadevi vs The Land Revenue Commissioner on 13 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32457 of 2009(B)


1. M.K.USHADEVI, VILLAGE OFFICER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUGATHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :13/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                      ------------------
                     WP(C) No.32457 of 2009
          Dated,-------------------------- 2009
                  this the 13th day of November,
              ------------------------------

                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who is working as a Head Clerk in the Revenue

Department, is aspiring for promotion to the post of Deputy

Tahsildar.

2. Ext.P1 is the seniority list. The petitioner states that by

Ext.P2 order dated 05/05/2007, along with 16 others, she was also

placed under suspension, and was reinstated by Ext.P3 order dated

02/07/2008. Subsequently, by Exts.P4 & P5, several of her juniors,

including all others who were suspended along with her, were

promoted. It is her specific case that 78 persons in Ext.P4 and 28

persons in Ext.P5 are her juniors.

3. Since all others who were also placed under suspension

along with her have been promoted, the petitioner also seeks

similar treatment. It is seen that urging her claim for promotion,

she has moved the respondent by filing Ext.P6 representation, and it

is her case that even that remains unanswered. It is in these

WP(C) No.32457/2009
-2-

circumstances, this writ petition is filed.

4. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P6 representation is

pending consideration, at least for the present, the petitioner’s

grievance will be redressed, if the said representation is considered

by the respondent on an expeditious basis. Therefore, I dispose of

this writ petition directing the respondent to consider Ext.P6

representation as expeditiously as possible, any rate, within six

weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy

of this writ petition.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along

with a copy of this writ petition before the respondent for

compliance.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)

jg