High Court Madras High Court

M.Krishnan vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By on 17 July, 2008

Madras High Court
M.Krishnan vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By on 17 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 17-07-2008

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.29894 of 2006
(O.A.No.4810 of 1995)

M.Krishnan									.. Petitioner.

Versus

1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by
The Secretary to Government,
Environment and Forest (FR VI)
Department, Secretariat, Madras-9.

2.Principle Chief Conservator of
Forests, Teynampet, Madras-6.

3.District Forest Officer,
Social Forestry Division, Trichy03.

4.District Forest Officer,
Trichy Division, Trichy-17.

5.The District Forest Officer,
Dindigul Division, Dindigul.						.. Respondents. 


Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceedings in G.O.Ms.No.332, dated 22.12.94, and quash the same to the extent of prescribing the minimum educational qualification as basic qualification for appointment to the post of Forest Worker and direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for appointment to the post of Forest Worker with effect from the date of appointment given to other similarly placed candidtates by the 4th and 5th respondents in their proceedings PA.A.No.3/90/PA 2, dated 10.1.90 and S.No.73/92/E1, dated 11.3.92, with effect from the date of appointment given to the candidates mentioned in those orders with all monetary and service benefits. 


		For Petitioner 	  : Mr.R.Singaravelan

		For Respondents   : Mr.T.Seenivasan
					    Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.1.96, is directed to be disposed of by the third respondent, in view of G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated 8.3.99, on merits, within a specified period.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader has no objection for this Court passing such an order.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, without going into the merits of case, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 19.1.96, in the light of G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated 8.3.99, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been disposed of till date. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the third respondent a copy of the representation, dated 19.1.96, and the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated 8.3.99, along with a copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

csh

To

1. The Secretary to Government,
The State of Tamilnadu
Environment and Forest (FR VI)
Department, Secretariat, Madras-9.

2.Principle Chief Conservator of
Forests, Teynampet, Madras-6.

3.District Forest Officer,
Social Forestry Division, Trichy-3.

4.District Forest Officer,
Trichy Division, Trichy-17.

5.The District Forest Officer,
Dindigul Division,
Dindigul