High Court Kerala High Court

M.N.Sankaranarayanan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
M.N.Sankaranarayanan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8344 of 2005(R)


1. M.N.SANKARANARAYANAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. M.N.PRABHAKARAN,
3. M.N.CHANDRASEKHARAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE.

3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.T.RESMI DAMODARAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :15/07/2008

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

              --------------------------------------------------------

                         W.P.(C) 8344 of 2005

              --------------------------------------------------------

                         Dated: JULY 15, 2008

                                 JUDGMENT

The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P2.

2. Ext.P2 is a revenue recovery notice issued against the

petitioner for realising amounts due in terms of the orders

passed by the Labour Court, Kozhikode in Claim Petitions

Nos.53, 54, 55 and 56 of 1978. In the statement dated 1.12.2007

filed by the 4th respondent, it is stated that the dues as per the

orders in CP Nos.54, 55 and 56 of 1978 have been realised and

disbursed to the claimants on 9.3.2006, 3.3.2006 and 9.3.2006

respectively. Along with a memo dated 26.5.2008, the learned

Government Pleader has produced a letter dated 24.5.2008 from

the District Labour Officer, in which it is stated that the amount

due in terms of the order in CP No.53/1978 has been disbursed

to the wife of the claimant on 9.4.2008. From the above details

furnished by the respondent, it is evident that the dues in CP

Nos.53, 54, 55 and 56 of 1978 have been recovered from the

petitioner and the same have been disbursed to the claimants.

In view of this, there is no necessity to continue the

WP(C) 8344/05
2

recovery proceedings initiated by Ext.P2 as the claim is fully

satisfied. For that reason Ext.P2 will stand set aside and the

writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE

mt/-