High Court Karnataka High Court

M N Srinivasa Iyengar S/O Late Shri … vs Amjad Pasha S/O Late Abdul Kareem on 17 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M N Srinivasa Iyengar S/O Late Shri … vs Amjad Pasha S/O Late Abdul Kareem on 17 December, 2008
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS TI-EE zrm DAY 02* DECEMBER 20%}
PRESENT   "

THE HoN'BLE MR.JUS'i'ICE V. eoram    

THE Hownw MILJUSTICE   

MISC. FIRST  x;:~._=1,g_§; 2605 

BETWEEN:

MN. SriI1ivasaiiy'é§i1gar,    

S/0. Late  -:"~.r_.gai_','._'  '

62 years,   ;f  ' '   ._  

No.6?', 15."*";"*'1+*"T('.-'H.1f¢'ss, '*3, "

V.V. Mcs}1aiL_a,,      _ _

MYSORE'.   ' _   ...Appc11ant,.

(By 3,:-1. tie; Sa.§bJIi;--.fid§. -- Abscn y

" 5.4..   A.  ' ..... .. V

  

%M%ajor% *  

S,+_'_0. Late fibdui Kareem
-- }Z>o5Io.'2627, 7&1 Cross?
 Agarasarakcfi, _

 , K33. Mohalla,

  Z'v.4.};Sa3re. _
'{D<=:Icmd before the Tribunal)

V V  " 3-éanjundamvamy',

S/0. Sn'. Mahadcvappa,
Eikivtar,

Keg alawadi Village,
Chamrajanagar Taluk.

',...._""'---v""'-5.-Isa



 

ta)

3. M/s. Oriental Insurance
Company Ltd.,
Branch Ofiice 11,
RB. 510.210, Nome
Chamaraja Double Road,

 

Mysore.     

(By Sri.K.K. Vasanth, fer R-3;,  A'
R-2 Deleted   
R«- I Notice dispensed vs-*1i;?_j1}"~~

This Misc. First zmpealreeis fi.Ied""under S'ec;"173(1) of MV
Act against the Judgment   dated 14.3.2006
passed in Mvc.No.207é/.2002ve'o'n,;h:3-fzie of the IX Addl.
Judge, Court .01' Smallf Ca1;ses_, Avvkiember, MACT-'7,
Metropefitan Area,';-Bai1ga:10re,'««{SC€:H__£iI0.7), partly allowing
the claim peeition.{fer;_e0Inpensa.1it§:3 and seeking eztlhaneement
0feoI11p€I1sa?fi0i'i;'~ ""'   .--  

   .cem.ing on far admission this
clay,   J._,"d.eIivered the fe110wi11g:--

 e  .:~.:+.:;.<.~.mr1~

 r'eppefl'e"r1r. has challenged the judgment and

 de.red«..A:V'14_._3.2006 passed by the MACE', Bangalore,

  enhancement of compensation awarded in

  fa-:firQtjr...  MVC No.2(_)76/2002 towards bodily injuries

   by him in the motor vehicle accident.

 2. The learned ceunsei for the appeilant is net present.

  {Therefore his arguments are taken as heard. We have heard

the arguments of the learned eeunsel fer the respondent»

c_______(“‘-.-..a-“‘\…-

C. Tewards expenses of attendant
charges, nourishment, ;
conveyance ete., – Rs.25,000 Q

(1. Towards less of enjoyment
And Amenities in his L” ‘
future life

e.’Fow’ards permanent . 11’

Ivan ;f:e &eRs1;figeee)§%

5.Thusthetouflifieefififiefeafiéégeafioniflflguxmd by ?

us in this appeal evlnich is in adéition
to in the impugled
jtldmerfifééiiifii interest at the same rate
of 6% fi*eAm_:the ‘ till the date of payment. The
fCSp0I.}g’i€I}twIE¥iS1fif1f§§?..(1CpOSit the enhanced ameum of

interest therein Within four Weeks
receipt of a copy of this judment.

appeal is aflowed in part.
Z : Sdfle
Jude?

Sd/-

I udge