M Narayana vs State Of Karnataka on 3 October, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGg;;,o:1§g:?'%§"'   ~
DATED THIS THE 3&0 my 05' C_)_C:.'.I'{)4BE'}R'," 29:53    
BEFORE é Q M ' % " %V 2
THE HONTELEE MR. JusTIcE'AS§§oK"13._ iH:N1c1';'tGimz.,% 
CRIMINAL mrmon z~1q§2»:33%.   
ANEKALTALUK    3 V - %
BANGALORE RURAL_I)3STRiTtf3"§'.  
   I     %_  PETITKJNER
(BY SIW11up{}SHFA:Ff)§?»$RI :ASf-{OK PATEL, ADVOCATE}
STA'?E_OF'-K2§R?J9§?';%KA   ~~~~~ ~ '
BY2ANE.'KAL POLECE STATION

Rama BY"I§.¢1."P,P  ' 
  *  RESPONDENT

. (BY SRE HONNA¥’PA, HOG?)

“THIS GEL)? iS FILED U/S/438 CR.P.C BY ‘THE ADVOCATE FOR’

1 5AI€’I’IGIP5TORY BAIL IN ‘THE EVENT’ GP’ HIS ARREST EN CR.NO.7″2/08
V U_CrF P;.Nl:3KPgL-AP.S,, HLORE RURAL DIST, WHICH IS REGD. FOR THE
V’ P/U/S1119, 365, 392, 511 OFEP .

%m>2 THE FOLLOWING:

.PE?T’YI’IONER’ PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PEWTIONER ON

” CRLP. COMING ON FOR ORDERS TH¥S DAY, THE COURT

the last 5 -» 5 months itscif discntitlcs the petitioner to ‘Agra

bail. I decline to grant the anficipatozy bail. it

clear that if the pctitittmer moves for ‘

surrender and/or arrest, the same fie

accordance with law.

6. Subject to this obscrfifgfion. is disfiaiésscd.

bvr