IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 20524 of 2006(R)
1. M.P.MEERASA, AGED 56,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent
2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION,
3. KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
4. KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
For Petitioner :SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.JOHN MATHEW (RETD.JUDGE)
The Hon'ble SHRI K. Justice J.THOMAS STANLEY(RETD.ADDL.DIST.JUDGE)
Dated :09/12/2008
O R D E R
SRI. K.JOHN MATHEW (RETD.JUDGE)
AND
SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
================================
W.P.(C).No.20524 of 2006
================================
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2008
AWARD
The petitioner is present. The Secretary of Kerala State
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has sent a letter
dated 6/12/2008 to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services
Committee stating that, no case is pending before that
Commission. The petitioner stated that the matter has already
been settled and the settled amount has been paid. He also
stated that the Board has yet to withdraw the Criminal case
against him. The petitioner may move the Board for
withdrawing the Criminal Case.
Under the circumstances, the Writ petition is disposed of as
settled.
SRI. K..JOHN MATHEW
(RETD.JUDGE)
K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
scm
? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
+MACA.No. 1738 of 2008()
#1. THE MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE
... Petitioner
Vs
$1. M.K. MATHEW, AGED 52 YEARS,
... Respondent
2. BIJI MATHEW AGED 22 YEARS,
3. JIPSY SARA MATHEW, AGED 16 D/B 28.04.81,
4. BOBY P. ABRAHAMS/O P.T. ABRAHAM,
5. SAIJU PHILIPOSE, PATHAKUZHIYIL HOUSE,
! For Petitioner :SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH
^ For Respondent :SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE
*Coram
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN
% Dated :04/12/2008
: O R D E R
M.N. KRISHNAN, J
———————–
M.A.C.A.No. 1738 OF 2008
———————————
Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Pathanamthitta in O.P.(MV) No.403/2007.
One Mariamma Mathew died and her husband and children had
moved an application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act
for compensation. It is seen that at any rate there is a Personal
Accident coverage and so that an amount of Rs. 50,000/- is covered
as per the terms of the policy. The question whether it covers a
larger amount or what is the impact of the policy etc. are matters
that requires consideration by the tribunal at the final stage of the
case. So leaving open that contention to be decided and as the
P.A. coverage is there for Rs. 50,000/- , I do not want to interfere
with the decision rendered by the tribunal regarding preliminary
award.
The M.A.C.A lacks merit and accordingly it is dismissed.
M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE
vkm