M.P. Moideenkutty vs The Secretary on 1 September, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24022 of 2008(I)


1. M.P. MOIDEENKUTTY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :01/09/2008

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                        ===============
                     W.P.(C) NO. 24022 OF 2008 I
                    ====================

              Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008

                             J U D G M E N T

In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is a

direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P3 application for replacement

of a vehicle.

2. If Ext.P3 has been received and is pending as asserted by the

learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no reason why it should not be

considered and orders passed.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the

respondent shall take up Ext.P3, consider the same and pass orders

thereon if Ext.P3 has been received and is pending. This shall be done, as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a

copy of this judgment.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the

respondent for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp