M.P.Prakash vs Dr.M.V.Seetharam on 26 June, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT 0:: KARNATAKA, B»amé§5§.03§'$A'*%M&'  = '

'RP. §'?'3S>i}f€}9

mass *1';-3:5 THE 26"' EA?-GF'3LIP§E.A2GVC§§ :'  

BEFQRE

THE HGNBLE MR,.3us'r£c:E3 ;w,NAéAM6HAN  

war? PE'§'I'§'IC)N NQ:173§G}';§_)'O'9(._GM;CPn';}'A"V:

BETWEEM»      *

1

M,P.PRAKAS?_H,  y5§ARs;,_  4% .
5/0 PUT'¥}3;S$F.?AMvE'GOWD_A'~~.V  A '
7*" GAY $CH€3€2?i~ RC=AD}"7.' ._ " 
BY T!-11.5-SI£)i.£.OF"£;f!e.)(MI  
INDuVs7RzEs,%%VARv*«mms:'m;AR %
EASAVANAHALQ;  '  " .
<:Hz;<KA!s4A:3A:_u.Ru. _ " "

cm. §{ALL.éSi-4; 4avEARé3,
5/ac.a. VEERABHAQRAPPA,

%  éS;K.R(3}41£);AK.M.ROAD

.-_; .
Ji"

 A VC§*€IKi<5'¥v*¥;§§-{$§5sL£..1R

 ""'*{8y st: *~RA'v'§~'L s;,»:».:m, AmI.,)

w  'AA'£'f£j.'f§§.V.SEETHARAM
  ..._ADVOCATE, LMP, MBBS,L.i...$,

§..i...f\*'I, M.G.ROAD 3: BASAVANAHALLI,
CHIKKAMAGALUR

aax/**

 PETITIONERS



5 W.P.I7390f09

Accerdingly,

reference to the respondents

:

the writ petition is hereby rejec’:-t:e.d