High Court Karnataka High Court

M.Prakash vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M.Prakash vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 November, 2009
Author: H N Das

mmg HEGE saggy Q5?

ikfiffifi Tiiifi $33 12% may 3? ta$*§E:%mE3_§_:§%:§§- -. V

BEFQEE

mg Kafimiz ER. JEISTECE 3: -2%’

war: PE’iTI’i§I~I ficxzg 3; :i4§’.s3;é§§5′ $E§{!L’i§§3 EE 2 * A . _

BETWEEK :

g. maiiswfi

S; $ mmma

53$: 35 YEARS

Rig? Hazaafi V
sfimfl VAEII
i}H$%;Fs.LLa9;PI3?f€;.*i’€¥?é’§? % = .
figfimaw

_ __ _ V A _ mmifimg
aaékzg. 3.9%”;

3* % _’§’HE é*1’§::’*E 5:313″ Eamaram
‘, sfiagmmsy
313$? Exiiififi

. VIi}E£sL?E.A$QB’.§f§&
‘-

A _ % ma Exmsg
u mrmaixmmmmvgg
~§%’E;XT Ta: §§RP§EA’i*§Q}§
: I 3

.32? fifiififi?

‘I”I-K8 WE. $ FIJZEB UHBEE AR3;”i§LE$ 32$ &§3′? Q?
Q€’.l3RS’i’E’I”€}TZ§R SF Efifiifix F%Y%G Tfi QEASH

E1′; 22″ <3u23{'3§ Vmfi Afi-8 Ffififififi B?'

ii: 1: E'§'*$.,

Tms FE'I"I"1"I€)I'%" ncszmri; Q3 mg

mvgmfi satire}? mm 'Ti-IE _, _ _v
GREEEQ ' A.

Ea zhia Writ ?$4n’§1§n «me ggfifiéfiafihag _;E V’ x

in tha nattzm af emfisrari $9 gréw dt,
22, 39.2099 gamma bgfiiiae as law – Ci,

rajmfiw the mqfzmt ski: fiéf his

bugsum §}.ar.:ea% $31; »;§’:A %;:; 13% @595

2 geutiaam? af’ gm iiemafi 5 me
respataémta; _§;i3;gL4″2&3.’§5’m:_tit. =§§;’*§.2§’§9 ramawafi. fhe CL»?
subject is ‘ sanéétzaam’

geétitiasm gaw 5. ragaamimm

tkfi rfigamfimfia as gawk ta}

fig ” giégev 3? ‘miazinfig Em

‘F33

Thg griam mfifiwé $3: aha gafifiganer

him, ia the raéiiza af 4% Ems; an $3

V V . gm” ” ‘ tha sagpmémtg aéafiimé {hat iifig méifi éisifame

fig mkm Eats ammmi

“”””N””W’I IIWV-Hlw wwwwrlv has ru”‘&I\I’watw.¥:”-$£’iI°ts IIIHWKH wwwma VJ!” mmnawmmmluw E'”$$§k*__§(~”?”””$ Q5″

at a éigtaenw arf’ 5.5 ma. fin thaws ymznéa the

pasazeé izhg izngazggfi éféfl’ fegmfim that

pmifinm far change at’ glam af ‘nsuaifiwsi

3, it ia hraught :9 my uffficé-_%t§.at u

iasueé a niremlar &t. 23:3 316$:-%’@:§;»m’ iws ra 4»: A

Q. 5:: &w’.pz~akaah Rgdéyg iefa§;x1:逧’–€¥i:’1:;:zk$1 ‘:*ar.a~2.m{ gafiiiafiw
eaeawés that tlfzxia .;:afii1;s ha 2:: he
takm in ta §¢g§s..;.;:.t éfim a pwmatim
path at ” is m rfikmee “:9
the af tibia gafifizznsr ia
raqufifieéi “the; ” reaysnéanw «~ autherimfwz.

fimca, ‘I:3:1e;J§ia%i$ 31$: Em guaghfi and $3

__ m.a$:t;a;.§? §§5 Ea

_ ‘*§2j;’Ei’i}2§§§ ax & ~–~ 3 Es kmefiy qt:

A ._ %Vé~;*a;«s§ mama; hsmum ‘Elia
X am E3
.A ; _ *%%ziz[?$at;.:m is hash?

Zmgufieé, asrém fit;

fie mafia

VA ta the fhiiré. fesgafimt far fiéwh fifigaaat in

aaemfiamm wiih Law by ewnfiéfiitag tbs 2:&§.%nt prafiéfiafig

unéw tha Exsiaa Act, Rakes ansi ma sfaxwiaz fits 3%; §£§ 3§§5 ;

{aha ; whfikm’ tiza péama

fimmga —~ fig

aufimtw. by the permimianer £5 withfm the t$ e:§.§::;::t;e gr

mt? Gréafié aemrdimiy,

Sd/-%L %%

JUDGE §,fl §%

S33