1}? THE HIGH Ci"_':L%RT €313' KARNATAIIQA AT BANGALORE
Dated '(ha :Z€;'fih dais? sf N{)V€fI_T1§3f3I' 2909
: B E F {J R E :
THE HC=N'BLB2- MRJLFSTXCE : \f..JAGANNATHf;§§
WEI?' §"~'E'FI'i'If>I\3 No; 32846 I 2009 fGM--CP"C'§""--«.T"'*,
ww %8sis:/m(a%&}s%%«»~i:'E9); Me:
BETWEEN : "M Am
a;;:~'¥51'
S331 Mjéiagasekhar, M °'-=.. V.,§»g_
3/0 $371 Muniswmny Gcwda, " ' " ' " _j
Aged about 4!} years, A
R/at.Khati1aNa.78?, 'F??9, : _'
A.mn1anik€re Achukattet, _
Gamdhinzigma, K0131" Kasaba: " _ . A_ ,
.. . "vv-..,J.§*€ti:itiener
( By Sri Mfihiufa }
A N Li;
.é=rr13,xI»Praniad; %
_ Sjn E;.53T.f':' B.;'F';,\:'7:2nk"$}far:1m,
_§ 'éged afigggt 59 years;
at
3 B},A";x*T.Ra1:11a11 Iiumar,
_ _ Sgoi .I;&¢e'-"B.S.Veni{atarazn,
._ 3~'§'g,=F=V":*_-€{__€:L1;ic:":_1'i,: 49 yfiars'
~ 351:}: Rf at Lagumenahaili Village,
Eitiamhalii Habli, Bangaiom Smith Taluk.
ii H Sri Iiyaxma,
' S/9.811 Ssemasandra Slfidappa,
Agaé 3.33021: 46 years'
4»; 83% Eianiunam,
S/*9 ijganna, Aged about :29 years.
2
(5.11
Sri Prasaxzrxa,
S/0 Iyanna, Aged about 20 years.
Respondent: No.3 to 5 am
R/at Bcomenahaili/Lagumcnahalli,
Bidarahafli Hobli, Bangalore. South Talulg
4 ; .Rt;';$§;1§ji1?i<:i:%:s
{ By Sri K.GnSadas.'{1i¥.raiah & 811% V. * "
Acivorntas for C/¥i'--V.3Mf.o I?--Er3." = -. '
Writ Petitiorlsfiled praying tt3_;;s;.--$ue Wfit «:3§.c<3ri;c;ra:'3_V
and quash the i:11:3L1.<2,I1r::;'§._ :;s1j<;l§:rA'<:IV1 13313.45 5:0
passed in {)S.N0.5*-'19/1999 dfat;¢d.VV_19.9;2.(}C§':, «in the file
0f the Civil Juclgev '. A1méx£1rc~J and
mnsequentlgr ta dismiss' 'tli e7::€;1:__.r::;ieif.~» fiiéd under
Qrdei{_\fI1I-- xéziie magtea 28.2.2003, at Axmaxure-J.
.j:x:i:i:ix;;,;tf't_:"'ma<:i¢ the foflowing :
can for pzvslimixxarvy hearing
ORDER
O 4: 93,2
C3;’13_i§3«*’1wmt pefiii0n5® by the piajntifi’ in C.>.S.Ne;
549/ 3.999 a;;c1%°”direc:ea against the grater passad by
‘ court an §9.9.20<}9 in respect Qf issuesfi ts fig
tbs: said erdar, the trig} mart answerszfi the aaid
{brass issucs in afiirmative and timreby tha plaintifi'
3
wafi forced {<3 apprcsarsh this cnurt in this writ petition
smirking for setting asidfi. the ilznpugnad Gfdfif.
2; Tha patitionar, being the plaintiff, filed the suit
CL$.NCL 549/ 1999 against the msponcients for
miuncfion and t9 restrain the def&nd;éi1§:35_~ _
intexfexing with 'Chi? plaintiffs lgwfui =
eniagzment 0:" the suit: schedule prsgiuertics.
agzticultural lands measzzfixgg éicrc lgLa11j;a#s
S.N{}. 11/1 and 4 acrfrs and 'ii:-:$'s:.:\Iov.v 12, along
with _h»z31;-Se and cattie shed of 5 to
6 anké3::aufs1$,A stejiéiei-Lj.7:7l§:féE:;%§:éi' 'évell and 3 pump heusie with
eu€;ai3?@ tus; 'jag i.-*-écés as week! ass paddy field situated
Bidarahafli E-Iobli, Bangalem
The Said suit was aanitzsted by '€:;h-.2
re$§0n,éen'€s~defendants and they also made cnuntcr
the said szlii. The trial court, based on the
_§f.éa§;i§1g$ of 'mi: parfiess framed the foilcrwirzg mm
V' 'issum:
4%
{ ‘1:
.3
8} Whether in a suit for permaflent iniuxztstioia the
saunter claim claimed defendants 3 to 5 for
d(i’–{3}.£1I’flti0§1 and ether cgnsequential is
maintainablzit?
9′; Whemer piaintifis are entitled fer–. T x
nemnanent injunctien as ::}1§’ayedziii1 5 .’
10) What ordar gr decree?
3; The respondents-defei§t’éi1£$–3 frfi T ffieé an V
anpficafion under CECE.
re-m1¢s::i:gT% dééléfe the sale transaction
§3et\&*esé;1V ‘G133: «anal Rajashekar (alaimziii) is
rm}? .,5§”1d”:r4§i{i~V 3}:<3t ezfiorcaablg 03:1 the third
. V. – ¢é§'=:?::j<1«t:§T%31:1itte€1 them :9 file 2; strmmtgr claim’
9?, Thereafter, tha petitianar meved this cgsmt in
‘W,P»E*4;’e:x 26111f2€?f}fEe Chafiemgng the ercicr ef the trial
scrum, zxghich had alimxzed the amaiicatioxx far counter
M
claim. This court, while ailowing the writ pefiiipn,
directed £116 trial court to take up
:;1e::1tiened above as pre3i1ni11arjs; is-sues 31$-..,.¢s3nVsi§;ier this .. 2
Salliii Pursuant to the said ‘t1’iaI
C(}I1’Sid€I’f32d i.ss.ues–6 t0 8 3:i1r::;1u’o1ie3.;i”‘abo1r¢:’ pefisse-*i_:”L.
the irnpugned order and .ifss1’1’¢é-:;..VV’§§2§re vvvanswemd
in the afmmafive court has got
_im’§s<:ii<:t:i<:.=:r1 to the court fee
paid on the and in a suit for
" claim by defendant':-3~
3 1:9 fife}? 'maiIitainabl$. Aggrieved by the
said the pxaantm" has Come up
'writ péiifjgna A.
* fifiard time: laarned caunsal for ilhfi paxties.
Tfzé Tvcounsel for tha petiticncr argued that the
AAt;#ial.(:m’.31*i: ‘esza$ ix: envy in censidering i3su:3s–6 ta 8
A’ 3 96:13.38}. of the: §3I’QCif:’€diI}§S of the trial ccurt
2 .. –i;€f¥€81S that 1331133-u::3 is 8 were éeiated by an Qrderr dated
3 LS:,2f;¥C)6 and? tilsrefare, the mtial court cauid mat have
(311613 again CQfiSid€ fi gait: issuefi-6 its ;% and passed
“E
1′
the inmugmtd erder, Sacondiy’, referring to the above
filing of the suit, which was on 25,11.1999, anti
appearance cf the defendants on 15,1;2.1999
Qf the written statement by the said def¢I1da;§. t_$7
16.102000, and than makmg 3 ‘<§'1;–.
28.22003, this suhmissiofl mafia
date: er fizmg of the. Wfiti€1TSt8;{di11§3f1? :;1¢jm;1¢:eyj%% %
claim that was made, there s%;?;’L§ a,lpnfi’ 3 days
and, therefore, the txiaziéi’ flQf£: have permitted
the defendants; to raise. :t}1e– _.c%.(»)_1′:;1’ite;:r””1¢i%i’§’§.a.i111 at such a
belatérgi sf«stag¢”‘Vr;1t3f£:’:1″1ce of the defenfiants got
aver withL§heVVf1iL*;1§§§f ivritten statement;
6f ~ is t§1€x1;vv__f.f,§’rr:tez1dr:d that the triai court alga:
‘ ;gfi:033.f:1:3§f’:;’i:ari.t<§._é:i2A__¢:rrQI' on the aspect cf Limitatilsn in resfieci
. iii" 'vclaim made by film dafcndants and SO aiscr
céizffv Eeeisw czammiited tha mistake in hgyiding that
V' :f_* court fee: gait}. is $uffiCi€fi'IL and; as such, ti}:
Vimgugngd arder calms: be susiiainfid fer thz: 3.b<:::'%:e
rEaS{§fi$3 In suyport of the above smbmigsizixns, this
iéjarrmd munseti griacezd reiianae 011 the ciecisigns
\\
4'
8
I’f:’.}3§1′”£€d in 1914(2) E{.as::L.J. Short Nate N0.:3Q5, page SCI,
ALB 29310 Caleutta 1?, AIR. 200% B{m’iba3I 183,'”A».TI.R.
1989 £Z}ris_f-3a 5:3 and LL-.R. 1999: Kamataka
si:r¢:n§;;tl1 9:” the afaresaid rulings, the _
seught for the petitien being
ordsr being set aside.
7. On the other hand, . i:orVVR–3 ti:
R-5 submitted that 1:23′;_5″‘~:?.rrcii” ha$–.’§;@;é1~:.committ$d by the
trial r:::_2urt; in passing §.fi1;9jj_1;:1″1ri:i c:v;:¥?,ii;.:1§’ an issues–6 to
8 “f:1*ii3″:.1§3”;£f1 “$a}déVVi’ssué_$”‘hé._Ve been Shown to have:
been €’3–€1€t€§ by the m€:i’Cioner’-L: counsai,
yatt,_ 3:33! Vf11éa:;:V”}Ci.”c-V31′ passed by this ccszzrt, the trial
‘ V’ . C313}: i..A’ha<:iz to ééiisidfir issuesé to 8 as ,T_3I'ff';'}iI}C3.iI."3,I:"51.1i""_'§—*
'Vit:s$i:§3;"'a:1:j'%':r;a%;;§3rd a. finding an them and, therefore, 110
Cf'??? cermmitted 1:23; tbs iriai couri: in passing
xths:-: z:§r-:i_ér 0:1 the aferesaifi issues;
N fig far as isha limitation is conccznefi, the
gubmififiian mafia by this: isgaxneé caunsfil is that, in i:h2:=+
courztar ciaim itself, it is stated that the cause Qf acfim":
9
arosae in the year 2003 and hence the Ln:-tliaf Seught far by
the defendants is weli within tima; As far as the court
Elite. ifs eoncemed, the: 311bmissic311 made is that
court has rightly held that the court fee paidiw.’
pmper and EVQII otherwise, this respondr:1::.t$ ‘:ViIl.A_Tpa3:’ {F123,
deficit comt fee, if so directed u.3:1t&é;’ f:: o11’e:rr:§;’::ési, ” ,
the submisséen made is thaf’ _$tagé- T£:}31;ig}1etion of
the eviiience of me ;vi72(1Z.1¥l”~–!_C§’i’=.».’,T~f'”.’.¥’~1_)?.1’C, can the other
hand, {ha crss_s~exa::n;;;:;§a;tionA ¥;>f fhe’~~.’;>1z:inti$’f and the
€Vif.’1fii’1§3€–.=$~f’ is yet is begin’ Themfere,
raéiyizag 5:2″; 3 {:€.>”x..1r£ reparteé in 2001(2)
i{m”.iL-Le}; €12 K}; “i*:h;:V_ :a:a_;’:–;::311issim}. made is £113: the saunter
» §f:lEef;;m., __y:;:5:r:::§:te3d to be raised even after fiiing caf
‘% §j,:3.%’:1%fitf§¢::n”T:;.Siat@m§nt bait, much befcrfi the 03.36 is
rséérvéd fag” juda;§m.€11{g As such, 31:: £31.11′: can be fauna
» nir:L’i”.§1&: imgmgged grder.
H Eizwizag thus hfiard bath sides, I de not 3&5 any
merit 1:’: {his writ petiiion far thas fgliazvizig reasans, That
frat flfifi 313 that thifs cmumrt, awhile fiifizinasizzg 0f WwP,’§’é’G,
i
r’
*2
EC-
2é111;’2i)€.’.25 on ?.9;2{3Q@, had diréctari ‘(ha trial cum: :0
censider issusjs-43 to 8 as prfifiminary issues and aftar
h€:ar;”1g bath sides an that, in 1:93:53 an order; fJn::1 e’:* th€
sgajd {2iFCi1II1S’CaI1C€S, the trial cezsurt had no <:ga';;':+:;fV.<;'3_';3i;?Ig;:11
but :0 pass: an ordasr 0:1 issuacsé to 8 '1':é:';s4_1:::=§'r_=.%;1';..VV
nraciselgr dent: 1:13' the trial 15:35 ': «"§a;é¥3Z:r1g:
impug11ed erder. Mr:rr21_3: ¥:n.=:.t:a_.3.1s:%.;f{r::”‘ (;’*.V_at;.;._~:-Vii?3-?£’;$;2£}06, the fact that
the order of this mart fawas = pa§ss¢€1l».”:i1uch later on
?;9,Q§}_06–_, £10 scope far that trial ceuri:
{Exam to {:~:*;.:1:=3~i{.”ZcéI;<'_f33;é 41331153 and ;3a$:-5 an Qrcien As
tkm g9 023_r.'§§.:1 missed in this regard d=::::s net merit
» 3; :_;.{t:a::5id.¢1**a:ion;
” the Iimitatien point is concerned, :11:
}sé;§*:”;e€§.a :§{;m1$&1 far the petitianer, by relying 91:3. tha
” V. rttferreé ta abova cited by him submitted that the
;;0:i,iA:1tar €333,111: cgrsultji mat have 236611 maria at 3. beiaieri
V “giage, that fee Lang after $116 filing af th-3 written
statameni and aftm” 3 gap af 12′.i’:% da’Ef;-Viz-E9 As far as $3313
E1
contanij-tm is cancemasd, {his team, in i;E1¢ ,_rf§;:1::§;1g
reparzsrtezj in 22{‘iO:(2_) Kar.L¢J. 610, aftar _
several decissiens of the Apex €Z30ur’:, ‘::*i,i1(~,{£j. 4.:}:1£:§t,–« ..
insvafar as the time limit f0rV=.Afi1i11g.?:QL1::t¢:”- ;-32:4
ceracemad, it can be f11ed_
statement: and it Car; bf: flia is not
Cfiiflpifitely closcird by :ém[§iA.§af9re the matter is
reserved £0?’ .i’iJ4iggn€ni;;’ the gas: is
will at film the p1aintifi”s
such, the question 91″
the cempleted dees not arise
gnd, also dtms not carry enough
fC§_1{§§:% 1;;{ehi_:1é’it;*–V…. %%%%%
‘ as the ceurt fee is rsonccrxned, the learneci
fria}; ju:i§;¢, the course 0f his orclar an i$SL1€~?, has
Agtisitd that aemrding it} the provisigns ef Secztien
V’ ~ sf’ Cieurt Fees & Suits Vaiuatien Act, thfi mar: fee
.?:’;a$ ‘:9 be paid for 1:115: razlief ciaiméd in :c€;$*m€-At Qf an
H agiculturai iazzd 011 the market valua csf tbs ymperty 23:’
R3. 1,9091», whichfiver 11:3 higher 311$ has aim netrzd that
3»
wf
Q53′
«A
…..
593′ {‘2$'(i~’;’I’ ‘;:ra:.~”z.$r;:d by that ma} court an issuesdfi ti} 8. The
ax .a.’§\””‘\\
-5
5
11>.
awn afzczr 1:31:-:: aznandment of the mitten statement by
way ef cmmter ciaim, the defendants have fmnished
fI’€’:Sh valuation slip and alga have paid additionai”‘cQuxt
fee: csf Rs.iZO{)/- fear the relief sought for in
ciaim. Therefczm, I ‘SS6 110 error of law co;13ujj1ittc=:t:i;’.§:§7y’ tiig
trial mart in recordixlg a ‘
defendantg on i:~:«sue–7’ Even”–oih.@rWis<-5,. :33' I'i*g1i't1§;*"~ %»
submitted by the ieamed fé1*..§2'–.§-:t{:L§R:6, the
ccsurt is always at "the. defléif caurt fee
from the r::spo;;dentsAVa1f£}I~.,fG'_.i§ie:i11"'r(§r3p;5s¢:<§f 0f the subject
mattézg' of thé s.e;i.1;L':o:_1I2i:er zarlaim.
1?, F§3;_ iihe 'af0frés:a._id«-..:*€;é_sons, I do not find an}? case:
magie' 213:1: f£::r» efiiuft ta: inttzrferes with 131$ impugxzed
tfiefgfem, I'€3j€C'i€d.
*~ {£133 aim mafia clear that the Qbsarvatiamfi mafia
abevé shall 139′: in any way irxflucnca: the trial
V. __:i%<::«:..::'"£: while disposing of the suit and tbs cauntar eiaim
on merits, The trial 001.11": is impressed upsn to disvpese
kw
xi
,/'