M Rangaraj vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 29 May, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W   ,

DATES THIS mm 29"' DAY OF MAY, 2w9

BEFGRE

THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE RN. NA(:};.¢§Qi:(:) h""A.V NV _n;a'sT.1_%:  . " V' %

--.~un.m-wu

REVIEW PETITION Nqgzsizoés

BETWEEN :

_--_ mama---_----»--u----_

Sri. MRANGARAJ

szo um: MADAIAH   .

AGED ABOUT SZYEARS  O
sUPERmTENDENTE1%:nxTEE1§ V  _   
BRL§1{ATHBA2~zGAL;Om:w»»OV   " 
MAHANAGARA EALIKE ' __     A
NOW WORKING   " A _   =
RAJRAJESHWAR_'iN'AGAR:;R.AN._ 'E, O O
BANGALORE-93. '~ 2. 1   PETITIONER
(By Sri. RANGANfiJI"HA Vs 'ICES 2%.-S_S'Q(';£AT'}3S, ADVS.)

AND:

-1 , 'BRLWMTH BANGALORE
 % *MA.'~1AN_AGARA--PALIKE
 ._}:i3?;P.B"1'.I*E;'$ cjc';Mmss1ON£R
BBW  NR SQUARE
BANGALQRE-92

 O Sri. M  SRINIVAS

 » Si;>'3?ERIN"IENI)ENT ENGINEER
'  'WM P E D

* ZBRUHATH BANGALORE

H MAHANAGAZRA PALIKE
NR SQUARE
BANGALORE~t)2.  RESPONDENFS

Lad'!

" O (By Sri. ASHGK HARANAHALLI ASSTS, A33vs., FOR R-2

R-1 59.)

_.... y4v~x.



2

THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UK) 47 RULE 1 OF CFC;
mzavme FOR REVIEW or THE ORDER DATED 06-03---.2G()_8«._ 
PASSED B~I WP 9144:2097, ON "ma FILE OF THE H0N'BLE..:¢fi_e1;e-  V " 

COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.

THIS REVIEW PETHION commas QNFOR  _  H  k

DAY, "rm, COURT PASSED "mm FOLLOWING; ' ' « '_ 
JUDGMEMIE 'A
This review petition is filed to  ordef  

in W.P. No. 914452067.

2. Petitioner     of mandamus
directing the  daed 06.03.2006,
20.03.2006

aeaé order the prayer of the
petitioner is eiieefefi to consider the request of

the petitioner :fepA1’e§e:1:i,;»’.-*itio1as referred to above. I find ne

te reeiewz. t1}e_«crrder dated 06.03.2008. Aecerdingly, the

tet(ie13{fpe1a;’tien_ .h8:eby__rejected.

Sfiigé
iuéfifi

‘ ‘ij£%’\\’»gI3eo52o09