IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 17336 of 2010(N)
1. M.S.MARTIN, S/O.M.K.SEBASTIAN,
... Petitioner
2. M.S.ANTONY, S/O.M.K.SEBASTIAN,
3. M.S.THOMAS, S/O.M.K.SEBASTIAN,
4. M.S.JEROME, S/O.M.K.SEBASTIAN,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
3. THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY)
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAKKALA VILLAGE,
5. MR.P.V.JOSE, PULLUKKARAN HOUSE,
6. MR.V.V.GOPALAKRISHNAN, 28/1099,
7. MR.M.K.SUKUMARA PILLAI, AVITTAM,
8. MRS.S.OMANA AMMA, AVITTAM,
For Petitioner :SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
For Respondent :SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.)
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Dated :03/12/2010
O R D E R
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J
---------------------------------------
W.P(C) No.17336 of 2010-N
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010.
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 8
submits that the interim stay granted by this Court was
already vacated, as per the order dtd.20.8.2010. It is further
stated that the dispute raised by the petitioners with
respect to maintainability of the execution petition before
the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum was already
disposed of finding that the petitioners are liable to pay the
amount as ordered by that Forum. Under such
circumstances, the writ petition has become infructuous, is
the submission.
2. On 1.12.2010, when the matter was taken up
there was no representation for the petitioners and hence it
was adjourned to 2.12.2010. On 2.12.2010 the counsel
representing the petitioners had sought time to ascertain as
to whether the matter has become infructuous. Today when
W.P(C) No.17336 of 2010-N 2
the matter was taken up again there was no representation
for the petitioners.
3. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is
closed as infructuous, accepting the submission made by
learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
Sd/-
C.K.ABDUL REHIM
JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A to Judge
ab