High Court Kerala High Court

M.S.Rajappan vs The Deputy Collector (General) on 15 May, 2007

Kerala High Court
M.S.Rajappan vs The Deputy Collector (General) on 15 May, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 15053 of 2007(P)


1. M.S.RAJAPPAN, AGED 54 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL)
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.

3. THE TAHSILDAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.PREMOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :15/05/2007

 O R D E R
                            ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                          ===============

                       W.P.(C) NO. 15053 OF 2007

                        =================


                Dated this the 15th day of May, 2007


                                J U D G M E N T

The writ petitioner, a Village Officer, placed under

suspension by Ext.P1 has filed this writ petition praying for a

direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on

Ext.P2, an application filed by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent

praying for revokation of his suspension, contending inter alia that

he was innocent of the allegations and also that he is due for

retirement on 31/5/2007.

2. In the circumstances detailed in the writ petition, I see

no reason why Ext.P2 representation made by the petitioner, if

the same has been received and is pending with the 2nd

respondent, should not be directed to be disposed of as

expeditiously as possible.

3. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of

directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2

representation made by the petitioner as expeditiously as

possible, provided the same has been received and is pending. I

also direct that the 2nd respondent shall take into account the fact

WPC 15053/2007

: 2 :

that the petitioner is due for retirement on 31/5/2007 and

therefore take expeditious steps for its disposal, if possible before

31/5/2007 itself.

4. Petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this

judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp