IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 2066 of 2007(U)
1. M.S.VIJAYAHARI NAIR, AGED 65 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
... Respondent
2. SMT.SHABEELA BEEVI, RAGAM MANZIL,
3. SRI.V.SREEKUMAR, T.C.3/2783,
For Petitioner :SRI.SHAMMI VIJAYAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
Dated :18/01/2007
O R D E R
P.R.RAMAN, J.
```````````````````````````
W.P.(C) NO. 2066 OF 2007
```````````````````````````
Dated this the 18th day of January, 2007
J U D G M E N T
Exhibits P6 and P7 are challenged by the petitioner, who is
the Secretary of Welfare Association. The petitioner contends that
the variation as allowed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal
by Exhibits P6 and P7 will adversely affect the interest of the
residents in the locality. Exhibits P6 and P7 were passed as early
as in August 2005. There is no explanation for the inordinate
delay in filing this writ petition. That apart even according to the
petitioner based on Exhibits P6 and P7, varied permits have
already been issued. If so, this writ petition cannot be entertained
and relief as sought for could not be granted.
2. However, if there is no bus service in the area as a
result the students and the general public are adversely affected,
they can approach the RTA for redressal of their grievance.
With the above observation, this writ petition is dismissed.
P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE
Rp