High Court Kerala High Court

M.Sadanandan vs The Secretary on 24 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
M.Sadanandan vs The Secretary on 24 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1894 of 2007(A)


1. M.SADANANDAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

3. THE PROJECT ENGINEER

4. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

 Dated :24/01/2007

 O R D E R
                            K.K.DENESAN, J.

                   -----------------------------

                         WP(C)No. 1894 OF 2007

                   -----------------------------

                Dated this the 24th January, 2007.



                                 JUDGMENT

In Ext.P5 judgment wherein the petitioner is the

appellant, a Division Bench of this Court while rejecting

the claim of the petitioner for reinstating him in service

in the Nirmithi Kendra at Wayanad, of which the first

respondent is the Secretary, it was made clear that if the

appellant makes a representation for future appointment in

the Nirmithi Kendra, the same will be considered in

accordance with the rules applicable. The Division Bench

rendered the judgment on 31.7.2000. On 30.12.2006, it

appears that, he filed Ext.P7 representation before the

Chairman and District Collector, Nirmithi Kendra. The

petitioner wants a direction to the Nirmithi Kendra,

Wayanad to consider Ext.P7 representation. As already

noticed, the Division Bench while disposing of the writ

appeal had made it clear that the representation filed by

the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with the

rules. Hence, there is no necessity to superimpose one

more direction in the same lines and in respect of the very

WPC 1894/2007 2

same subject matter. The relief sought for, is unnecessary

for reasons stated above. Hence dismissed.

K.K.DENESAN

Judge

jj