M.Sathianathan vs Director Of Higher Secondary … on 4 July, 2006

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8709 of 2006(M)


1. M.SATHIANATHAN, (PRINCIPAL UNDER ORDERS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MANAGER, RAMAVILASAM HIGHER

                For Petitioner  :SMT.P.V.ASHA

                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :04/07/2006

 O R D E R
                                A.K. Basheer, J.
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                         W.P(C) NO. 8709 of  2006
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   Dated this the 4th day of July , 2006.
                              J U D G M E N T

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

2. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the

view that the contentions raised by the parties need not be dealt with at

this stage.

3. My attention has been invited to Ext.P12 petition pending

before respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that Ext.P12 was preferred in February 2006 and no orders have been

passed on the said petition so far. I am satisfied that it will be in the

better interests of all parties concerned that an appropriate decision is

taken on Ext.P12 without any further delay.

4. Therefore this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to

respondent No.1 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P12 as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment. Respondent No.1 shall ensure that

the petitioner and respondent No.2 are afforded sufficient opportunity

to be heard before any orders are passed.

Petitioner shall produce a certified copy of the judgment and a

copy of the writ petition before respondent No.1 for compliance.

A.K. Basheer

2

Judge.

an.