M Shivaraju S/O Madegowda vs The Secretary on 11 September, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 11:11 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 

BEFORE

THE I-ION'BLE MR. IUSTICE  NA.GAM'O'FIAVI3i   

W.P.No.2§72§z2wgI<:1Vg;$.j;:§j

BETWEEN:

IVLSHIVARAIU
s/0 MADEGOWDA .. ~
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS   1 j;

occ; AGR1AGLrL'rUR}3"1i§rA;  " _ 
R/O BOLARE, I;1'*1"ARA}1AAL1A,1"'i1031.:
BANGALORE SO{}TH«TAJ£;UK""~  
BANGALORE. - "  ' .-- 

~ ..PETITIONER

 - my s¥;.:"}3,z,-L.M@1:AsI-'1i,'A}i)V.)

 3;. A THE SECRETARY
_ VCOMMAITTEE FOR REGULARISATION
  . OF UNAUTHORISED CULTIVATION
 _.._ BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
..  " BANGALORE.

@L-'m/\



 

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DISTRICT,
BANGALORE.

_J..RES'POlJ]3ElV"li"S»    

(By Sri RKUMAR, HCGP )

This writ petition filed under  226    of the
Constitution of India praying to qiilaslr the "in_1p1,1gned' order dated
24.6.2003 passed by the respondent 1?lO:.v1l§iSg:p¢f;AnneXure*F

This petitiorngomingfll b:1.Lf;;r1’pré11;rlina:g% hearing this day,
the court made the :iQ.ll0Wi::1’g;€; =

‘ V’

In this ii2irri1_–:gpetitgionlthe petitioner has called in question

the order 2¢l.6~. by the first respondent rejecting

the claim ‘of the ‘p’etiti_one.r for regularisation of his unauthorsied

c11:lti’v,atio.nl’of’3a:5:”guntas of land in Sy..No.97 of Nettigere Village,

Bangalore Taluk. Against the impugned order, an appeal is

il”»-<,__l'provideéi.,VSi1brule 6 of Rule 108D of Karnataka Land Revenue

,rRlll€S,..T1976. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to workout his

aim

remedy by filing an appropriate appeal, this writ

hereby rejected.

Learned Government Pleader isA=.Apermitt:ed«’rtQ file’ nieino ‘E31?

appearance Within three weeks.