M. Sivadasan vs The Regional Transport Authority on 23 January, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 2699 of 2008(U)


1. M. SIVADASAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY,

3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :23/01/2008

 O R D E R
                           ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
               ------------------------------------
                          W.P.(C) 2699 of 2008
              -------------------------------------
                         Dated: January 23, 2008

                                 JUDGMENT

It is contended before me by the petitioner that while rendering

Ext.P3 judgment, the STAT had not considered the arguments raised by

the petitioner relying on the decision in Aysha v. RTA, Kasaragod – 2006

(3) KLT 1013, and also that the primary authority did not issue notice

before Ext.P1 decision was taken.

2. These points are not seen urged when the appeal was heard,

and, at any rate, these arguments are not seen reflected in Ext.P3

judgment. If, as contended by the counsel, these were urged but not

considered, it is for the petitioner to seek review of Ext.P3. In view of

this, with liberty to the petitioner to seek review of Ext.P3 judgment of

the STAT, this writ petition is dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

mt/-