High Court Karnataka High Court

M Srinivas vs B G Vishweshwariah on 24 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M Srinivas vs B G Vishweshwariah on 24 June, 2008
Author: H.Billappa
  

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H16!-J  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH 0

m Tim HIGH COURT or KARHATAKA arr BANGALORE
mun THIS mm 24%! my car JUNE,  

BEFO%

Tim I-I(JN'BLE lJ!R.JUS'rIC__E»..I-I,_B1I.M5.IF"£i*";¥Af,~:V, *:  é  
0'''A/¥*L&:.':e..m,saEl* 4"' %  %   

M.sR11mms   f   
sjcmm NI£INm!£l'i"JAP?_AE~. Q    %
mmszacxrrzg Yams  ;    
zemr cr:sr:1ia.sAr¢DR:zecLc31w  %
QIDRE:-,"fiIBR.&.Ms':1€¥.Fa.HIR&._' 
mm', Uivrfiflfil-ifilrfivfiflflii  A

 %

my-Va   m   Tm. A   
wzo GAHGADH£R'Em'mIERs
[BY SR" 3575- 

3.9. 
8:6; %%%% ~
su3E.DAB«:£Jf:é3 yams %

 xx-A   
s; 0 VEN.Ka!«T&¥3:fi.SPsFPA
f;<}EB  as 'mans

  ~,mSTPf'D_I§DEm"S 1 5.2521:

   mgmmg M Kammcn RYTHARA

% _   m
~ % 1'10. 92, 1% FLOOR

  ROAD, OP?%ITE
 TPEATRB-. C 

 ~  ---- 13.

 Lei-mmwamm
 Wit) LATE MUHHIAEJAPPA

AGEI3 ABOUT 63 YEARS
M. VEHKATASHAMIAH [VEHKPGESHJ

Si O LATE MUNINANJAPPA
MEED ABOUT 4% YEARS

L,/"



"IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 1-HGH  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA FHGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H3611 Ci

5 M. RAVI
S! O LATE MUNIHANJAPPA
AGED OFT' 36 YEARS

RESPONDEITFS 3, 4 & 5 ARE
Rasmzm AT crmmasamm
mmmmvamm ms?
uwramz-mxgu I-IQBLI   ~ '_ 
Bmmmks - 56-0 ()61._._ <

{BY sm: us.   
W393 31 

THIS  PE-'I'I_7I'IC)E'~ 1f'.5'v'P'I_I.ED, 'PRAYiNG 'PG
QUASH THE ;OOOOOmmmHED*  (mamas, BOT!-I
namnzaafsimg  3.3-'.150. *?7e5m3o1, OH
'mm mm €33'   gm CML JUDGE,
1¢3ny;::;:A3Pfi3$ED ¢31'~I...*I'i-IE. TWO INS, ONE-
(RIDER Q-RDER'.3 Om; (me (annsxum-A) AND
AB-0'1'!-IER UlTD_Ei2;'f~-QEEDER' O14 RULE 5 C.P.C VDE
A!l!IEXURE_-BAKE) Em;    "

Ti-IIS PE'1'n5roi~I COHMIG 03 FOR camams

*VvzIiIsO%%§*:eA€t,j:'11E mom THE FOLLOWING:--

7  magma pazmon under articles 226 and 227 of

-  Comfimfin of India, the peti1:inners have calhd in
X     the ardecr dated 30.05.2003 paused tar the trail
A    in CLS.Il:3.7'?06I2OG1 on ya. flied under Order a
 1(a) at cm and also umm cm: 14 Rule 5 of

CPC. 

O O;.§:m:;s;=(3k  



-nun yuan: Ur Iu-\KNA!AI\A HIU-H 1. (.3!J,_i(! U!' KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA |-HG]-d' in allowing
1'11:   that the docu%

aoughizfta    no haarmg' on the issues

    thm-dare, trial Caurt was not

  the nppliaatiorn. He the Isubmithad
 tha t reasons are assigned by the trial
 tho applkafiuns. Funzm, he uubmithad
_     is a direction by this Court tn dispose of the
   within a apecifiad pariad. He aka aubmitmd that

  "HM
 mvmg regard to the plum ofthe par1:ies,the:ia;ues V

wughtmhefiumadu-enatatnllrequziredand

L/1.



-EIGH COURT 0:: KARNATAKLA HIGH comer or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH count OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (3

reapondenm that thus pmpeny has been acquired for the

hma: afthe saciety and sites have been 

they have hem allotted to varicua 
charax:'tez' ea' the land has been     j * L 
want to pmdwce some riommmfia. 
ptayed fir fr-amirag as , 

taking into   
and also the  allowed the
applioatinm.        patitionara
 d  juszmaa in
 find any merit in the
   fior the petitioner for
the nea5e'cn,2'  use 9:!' the respondents 1

‘V aiiit schedule pmperty has been acquired
satxhty and uitaes have been mm
Vvbecn allcatted to Various pm-sons. In
_ V this, they want no produced some
% Themf-arm, ‘at: my comidzred viaw, The trial
has rightly aflowad the applicatican.

9.InanfaraatheappIicatix>nux1derOrdczr 1′!-Rule:
5ofCPCia-<:t:nca'mc1,thetrmpor::1m1a1:d2have

{/