Madaiah vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 13 November, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,  "

DATED THIS THE 13% DAY (}F"I*€'-0VI?.:M_fV$'E:3'£:2',_ é;O.G.9 ''

BEI«f0R1§K__  
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTIt'§:E'-IRAM M0HAN"*I§I«:Di§Y
WRIT PETITION"  5Aoo'7?.;%' _2oo?3"'(s-ISRO}

BETWEEN

MADAIAH  _ ;;  ., . 
S/O. MADf~'$GQwI)'A'--V._ I  

AGE 53 YEARS :1, - ~ A 

WORK1N"GASi5RE 'EMU-'E, '1-NsI>E'CT0R

O/0. Ass1s'rAp;'T..R1~:VENI3E;OFFICER

BANGALORE MAH'ANAGARA_.PAL1K_1a: OFFICE
JAYANAGARI RAN GEL _IAYA'1'€AGAR

BANGALORE+ I1.-_    PETITIONER

 .  (Big 33 BAJANTR1, ADV]

';'rI§1'EcOI§i1yIISSI0NI«:R

 MAHANAGAR,/-\ PALIKE
N R SQQARE, BANGALORE -- 2.  RESPONDENT'

2 .. x(B"{ ASHOK HARANAI"iALI.I. ADV}

A THIS PETITEON FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 <3: 227

 I M  THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
'THE RESPONDENT TO IMPLEMIEZNT THE ORDER DATED

11.5.98 AND ANN--G AND TO REFIX HIS SENIORITY ON
THE BASIS OF THE DA'I'E OF PROMOTION ASSIGNED TO

bk



HIM IN THE ORIDIZIR I')!-\'1'I*ZI',) II.5.I998 VIDE ANNAG: ANI")
ETC.

THIS PE'I'ITIOE\I COMING ON FOR HEARING. THIS
DAY. THE) COURT MADE TITIE !'OI,I.OWING: 

ORDER

Recording the submissimi of iearriedl.e’0’u1f1$eI”{Of

the responcienti that the order die” IM1If5«. 1998;

refixing with retmspect.i\.rc effe(_ii.. i;he”.g;eni0f1ii;y”0f”~cte’;fi.;:;.iiig

_ employees with the m011etz1f’y”e»1I§e»nefit. W§}_.S’~’.iiitI’i(;If§iixri1 by

«.9

order (it. e:;1i1¢Jin

questiipnby’t:i1.e~._petii;iQi1e_i’.- me reiiegssought for in the
writ pet’i–‘:.i0n aI”?1re,”‘.i1i1Vé>;va’iIe1bIe to the petitioner. the

peti.?;i0n.is a<:e.c2.rjdi:1gIy r<;je(':t:ed. , n

sd/-

JUDGE