High Court Kerala High Court

Magnetic Systems Company vs The Director Of Training … on 22 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Magnetic Systems Company vs The Director Of Training … on 22 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22368 of 2008(K)


1. MAGNETIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, A REGISTERED
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING DEPARTMENT OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PRINCIPAL,

3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNENT I.T.I,

4. THE PRINCIPAL,

5. THE PRINCIPAL,

6. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT I.T.I,

7. THE PRINCIPAL,

8. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT I.T.I

9. THE PRINCIPAL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :22/10/2008

 O R D E R
                             V.GIRI,J.
                       -------------------------
                  W.P ( C) No.22368 of 2008
                      --------------------------
              Dated this the 22nd October, 2008

                        J U D G M E N T

Petitioner claims to be an authorized support center

of a wholly owned Government of India Enterprise.

Petitioner’s service is being rendered in relation to the

systems placed in 22 Industrial Training Institutes.

Petitioner’s grievance is that the amounts due under the

annual maintenance contract to be disbursed by the

Principal of the concerned Training Institute have not

been disbursed so far, apparently for the lack of

concurrence in that regard. Exhibit P10 is pending before

the 1st respondent.

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also.

3. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits that the 1st respondent required the originals of

certain documents. It is further submitted that certain

irregularities in the service rendered by the petitioner

was complained of in this regard by the concerned

W.P ( C) No.22368 of 2008
2

Principal. If documents which are in the custody of Princi

al are required, the 1st respondent shall summon the

documents and verify the same. Decision on Exhibit P2

shall be taken without further delay, at any rate, within

three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No.22368 of 2008
3

W.P ( C) No.22368 of 2008
4