High Court Karnataka High Court

Mahabala A Kunder vs Yashoda Rao on 8 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Mahabala A Kunder vs Yashoda Rao on 8 April, 2008
Author: N.Ananda
IN THE HEGH COURT 0:: KARNATAKA AT..B#:if§'i;}§§-i{t3n.I§E» _j 
DATES THIS THE 03?"  (§ E4"{=§;¥;I?iI§45,2;IZ};Iif)f$'..  '  
mg H(}N'BLE MR.Jt:§j':c,E N;'A1§A:§*D§;;§  
CRIMIM Lgwnvéfi Etfmx 2o é$" 

BETWEEN: " $  "  ' % A' 
1. Mahabaja;«§.V:'  
S} 4:: Ay§}an§ia._.i{a11Cha11

Aged ab.:i11t"'=%8.._yg3;€x--1it§s_   _  
I{a}mza£ij§:=.§e';F§;};m §.::i:.:;:1:;«.  

-2' aRics11a:£;;3ogu;,<;..   _ --
$3/0 Lair: V' 
Alg_«=.::d"abo'L1§ 46   Compound
;shwg:~ 3s;aga_:~ Mmupa}

3. ,  Piakash S-amanfh
" " S-in tax Saméiith
. Ag¢<1.,fs5.E.=;out 46 years, 'Pnajna' Shivapadi
 -  "5¥?DiEial_ 

4. _ P, Aj:ifi3Pai
 €3V;'(;"'i"'} Ramakrishna Pai
*~ Aged about 50 mars, Kalikalnba Nagar
Ambaipadi Udupi

  Vivckallanda Pail
Sins. T» Raxnalcrisltma
Age:-1:1 about 54 years
Megamallar Apartllieim t . , . Petitioners

(By Dr. S.Aru1m.1gha111, Aclvocatc}



1. M3. Yasiwtia Rat; V 
33,10 Late Madhava Rae; '£'4'i§1j01*
Saralabettu Near Athithya  ,
Manipal };}()Si Udupi Distri(:At_ 
2' State of Km11atai{a."A'* ; g V .
By the In:5;pa:f;0:r ofVI?{}}5(:~€:V  
Manipal Pqliczc-A St.§;ii(ét;..V V
Repms£::i1t€{i.__1--7}'S P P' » _ V V_ 
High C74?i11i'ff:;':.f'Kaifléitfika 4'    
Eangadedsrg.  " ' " ..   V  Respondents

(By snfI71,Han;in:a«m11a1~a3:appa,.,1:106? for R-2; R1~S4a-Ived)
Ti1is_ r’.’.,’.1.r’V$1V1:fiI.:’:’2:_-1,» fm:?_i;i’ti!m§”‘–is’ f:iiet:l undt31:* fitfiflfisffill 482 C1′. P.C1.,
prayi1″:gKto quemh ‘t.ha3V£m,pugI1.e–sd order sf the Addhcivil Judge
(Jr.E}n.) &.gJMF’G at Udupi”i–.r3 G.<;'..No.78:94/2003, for the masons
stateci ti1r31*cé'i;7§a:11r3Vc::-t1;: ' ' "

_ .. This gmtnityiéji-2 rxgyyxgixzg on for’ fi:’1::1}_ h¥i*E1I’il”1g this day, thca Court.
. mad.t3 tiéefoilsgwinlg:

0 R D’ E R
‘ A matter is taken up for hearing, it is llflficfifid
had ciitalieugcd zllnpugntzbd order in CI’iII1iI1»E:’I1
” N().1334] 2004 laefvn: this Cetui. On 11.03.2005,
Caouznsel for 1;)et:itiI1e1*3 sollght for permifision tau

Hwtithtlraw pt2i:i’i:i_eI1. Tim subm:ission was mmxfiad aud

acoultiilzgly, petifion was dismissed as witlzdrawn. M
y\; . . .

2. ThC1’CfDI’£3, Without going into merits
hold s11(x:c33ive ggetition llfliitiél’ ‘
nalief is :m:xt mainfaiuable.

l§.iS1}3iSS€(} .