High Court Karnataka High Court

Mahadev vs Bennappa on 20 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Mahadev vs Bennappa on 20 September, 2008
Author: K.Ramanna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED was THE 20% DAY 0? SEPPEMBER;,4':2OO§3    

BEFORE   ~

THE HODPBLE MR JUST¥CE"«K.R5_AMAP§I€A"    

REGULAR SECOND AFPEA.Ig Nc3'.923,!2G{)_275._f--w  

BETWEEN:

1. MAHADEV,

2. MANJU LA,

3. BHARATH1,  5li ..';'. ' '

4. MUKUND.

(FATHER Ef~IANAMA?'?A.CE%IK§{1Ji2, -- .
BY THEIR 'NEXT i"4'RIENVI3«.A'N]3%.1IIi€)I2
GUARDEAN male NATURAL rv;!.Q'IHER
Sm' KAMALAWWA, .  

W/O Hg,:~zAMAPPA..,¢Hn<:KUR.;

 3  sa§T':KAmi;~.Aww;é; ' " """ " 'V

. W10 }~EANAMAPPA CHEKKUR,

V' _ AGE' MA ;'c::R'.*  " --.

AP15I;L1;Am'S ii%_;'<§' 5 RESIDENT 0:?
CHIKKUR, ,1MU.::).£~§oL TALUK,

'BHAGALKGT DISYRECT.

 f *  'x'£xL_I..Afv' }5A,

_ QTQAMAPPA CPIIKKUR,
"AGE MAJOR, R/CF CRIKKUR,
MUDHOL TALUK, BHAGALKOT DEST.

" _ "-7. ' TUKARAM, S/O SADAPPA CHIKKUR,

MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS
NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL
FATHER RESPONDENT N03,
SADAPPA RAMAPPA CHIKKUR,
R/C) CHEKKUR, TALUK, MUDHOL5



8. SADAPPA, S/O RAMAPPA CHEKKUR,
AGE MAJOR, OCC: AC}RiCUL'I'UR'E,
R/O CFHKKUR TALUK MUDHOL.

9. VITHAL, s/0 RAMAPPA CHIKKUR.
AGE MAJOR, F2/O CHIKKUR,
TALUK MUDHOL.
APPELLANTS 5, 5, 7, AND 9 REPRESENTEII, 1 ~
BY PA. HOLDER LE. APPELLANT No.3    _ ' . _
SRI SADDAPPA, s/0 RAMAPPA CHIKKUR,x. .  ._ ' 
=    

(BY SRI KMNARASIMHAN AND SR1i?;’D;UR$,AE§V’S.:ABSI§i?NT}

1. smer BENNAPPA,.~S/O RAMAPPA’c;:{i.§;:a’:i;2,.:’ ”

AGE MAJOR, <_)C'C_;AGRi';CUL1?E£!RE,
R/O CHIKKU F£_._TA1;U_E§,.vMUE).HOLf ‘V.?$’}I*3K.£F§PA JEMBAGI,

2

3. 1AXM£1P§§’§/’CV.§}fEP§§£§§5R$§{v’JAMBA§;§fV;’

4. sHANK}xR,”‘é/O %kE:§’}§;aé1~aé;§,«§¢BAG1,
5 . _

. VITTAL, s/ub..VENKAa?PA._{IA2:iBAGr,
. Gumtgsgmm, s/’CJVENKAPPA J2%.MBAGI,

V” . P’L:;§1§>A.L;::~%,% S_Z:G.\/ENKAPPA JAMBAGI,

~15

7

3: “‘M§A2’=;;;*:*I JAMBAGI,

9. sM’PYAL;.A:Ié$irA, w/o YALLAPPA PUJARI.

~ 129.-». Mgvawtyé, W/O MAHESH GATAKAR,

«.Ai§f§ A.R1′;f}?ESIDENT OF HIDAKAL

RAIBaG. . . RESPONDENTS

_(4B§’-‘~.S:Ri S.S.E~iALALI FOR 94 TO 10, ADV.)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL iS FILED UNDER

SECTION 100 OF CK} AGAINS THE JUDGMENT AND DEGREE

DATED 26.6.2002 PASSED IN R.A,N(3.I14/1994 ON THE FELE OF
THE 13’RL. CIVIL J{)’DGE(SR.DN} JAMKHANDI, DISMISSJNG THE
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMEPYF AND DEGREE

DATED 20/10/1994 PASSED IN O.S.NO.379/1989 ON THEVFILE
OF THE ADDCL. MUNSIFF’, MUDHOL. V

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL comma ”
HEARING THIS DAY, THE comm’ DELIVERED THE FQ2,Low;m:.T ~

This matter was caiied oa’it’«a_g11d ovéf :Si:!.C§; the

Icarned counsel appearing for was not
present. .. «V A.

Called oéqfi appearing on

behalf of the V I»\fo representation is
made. appearing for
the appellagizts; the appml as the
same isAc\gidenf i1″Q:inV flat: Hencc, the appeal is

‘ aimisséd for