GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Hit.-EH £..’UUKI Ur ISAKNAIAMA ruurl u
m mm man cuxmm mmmxaar BANGAL; csE
namnw-mum arm LDA’f’C’Fd1JNE 2§f:’L’3E;_~ A’ %
2%..
mamamppa, SIG Y
Aged abcm', 5? yesara, V 1
R10: Erappana
Mysore 'Pg. 85 Din;~t;»i.:'=?'i:.:fl§._;j;+, }; 1; , .V.?..AppeBant
(By 3:»;
MID:
no-on-qua:---..
@ .__Ha
six: {Hm}
@Puu.-am.
Wfm his §v " ' pa,
-- ~ ah::'t.;£':S'4 ywrs,
, * zgw; mar 1543.14»! 1,
‘-Ham-fi_i_-I3ae&di Road,
Vflage, Myanre Taluk~571 104.
V . __?2.;* W19: ‘ ,
‘Life: late Hcrrimadappa.
Aged about 69 ymxu,
Rfe: E-ilélnere Village,
Human: Tam}:-571 105.
{.3
.3. Mamdeniamma, D19 Madappa,
W! :1: ivialmdcvappa,
Rim Emppan Koppalu,
Yelamala I-iabli,
Mymra Ta1uk-571 3.04.
[By Sri a.§,Kamm, Ad:%t;ef’».;fg¢r;E.Q, :..a.1a;&Hs H
«*5 ‘a-._
13$ EUISK is of C.–§.’_.AC,. t&
judmm and .23,2.2DOI5 passed in
R.A.23″erJ54~_§’2t)G3 9:1’ ‘ivof”€33:1Ji1’»»Judgc (Sr.Dn.] at
Huxmar aa3k.mi1*:.g 31¢’ 1va¢t@m aaidc the
j i 2E.’~=,3.f2§fl3 passed in
G.$.KagSfl,;59’3?;.O.H-Q31; Judge (Jr.Dn.],
t31*1VV.–i’é.ar lmring this day, the
301411
am far paxfitéun. ‘1″h:e txznueatixug
imputed that reiati-snahip of plaintifl’ and
as the son and daughter of late
‘% trial mart framad an ham to that efiect
the same in fawur of p1am11§’ ‘ . The trial
the suit for mtitfmn and granttad 11’3″‘
if 12%» share £3 Sufi: atriwduh pmpmy tn pzasmzm’,
‘£Ihe1’va§ar’a§ d¢fierndfl~respondem H32 herein was before
UH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CI
first arifienam mum WA c)G\»*”””””‘” CL” ‘ ‘
2,, Befaam the first appellate mart, the dnfendant V
we: mm aacuumm and cnnwndfi that any
t tr: dacidc the relationship of
datum Nc;..3 with me Madappa. The T-I
:31′ Eat appeilata mutt. segwaaizie
dfi ef trial cam”: and
mc+ans.1¥dc1~atiam,. Tmre is a
Him}. En my
gaassafi by
3, have mnsidered
the Rule 2′?’ along with
gr ah: first appeflate court had
_ <9: adciitiemal evidmca '3
dispmal of ease, t1':ne fiat appellate
O f have recardesd additicmal evixrlema by itself
the tune rm. mim. Instead, the Emit appellate
has wt—aside the judmm and dacrae of trial
com'? 51% Ended the marina' to trial court for fresh
31'! COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURF OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURI ur KAKNRIHNI-I Haul": LUUHI vr Iv-tllwunu-\I\n ruvars u..s.
'6\.7 . i "v-~