Mahadevappa vs Shivappa on 24 August, 2009

wp No.64732/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUs3f,?:2"eo9  I'

BEFOREC; V _ _ Vx
TI-IE HONBLE MR.JU$TIcE'°Aq1d-* . «. " 
WRIT PETITION No.64-E32/206%; :GMm.cP{;1"':~~.C"  
BETWEEN:  A 'C C'

1.

MAHADEVAPPA, .. _ -_ E
s/0 HEMAPPA GoUDEAsH:vANNAVAf<,.
AGE:56 YEARS, occm G_R1c'LrL'rURE, * '
R/O KURABAC-.ER1,;_ V '
RANEBEEyTNU;R; '
DIST:IjIA'!ERi-…_…';'. 'V ' " »

2. MALEAPPA UREMALLIKARJLIN V
s/0 I-IEMAPPA CEOUDRASHIVANCNAVAR,
A(}{E:4_6 OcC:AGE1cUL’rURE,
R/ 0 HANAGVVAEJI, HARLEAR –

DIsT:pA’.rANC:EI<–:;– _ '" …PE'I'IT1ONERS

(EYsR1..D1NES'H 1$A.KULKAR1\%i, ADV.)

,. 1. I A. « … . . . . . .. N

CSHIVAPBA, '
S /0. HEMAPFA GOUDRASHIVANNAVAR,
. "AGE:6i7f:'EARS,
»–..occ.:Ar3EIcULTURE,
R/0* BEHIND SIDDESHWARNAGAR HOSPITAL,
RANEBENNUR,
~ .–._DIsT':HAVER1.

LOKAPPA,

S / O HEMAPPA GOUDRASI-HVANNAVAR,
AGEIS 1 YEARS,

WP No.64732/2009

OCOAORICULTURE,
R/O KURABAGERI, RANEBENNUR
DIST:I~£AVERI. …RESPONDI:;NTS _.__

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225 AND’
OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF’ INDIA PRAYLNG TC:-‘SE’1’=A”3ID”EV”iTI-{EV
ORDER D’I’.28.05.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL–«JU;DOE<.gJR.'DN.)
RANEBENNUR IN O.S.NO.52/2008 VIDE ANP¥E.XURE~C"AS

IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTECE AND EQUITY AND E'I7C}',». 2 V

THIS PETITION COMING ON POE PREI.IMI.NARY"I}§EARI:NG, "

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE"FQLLOWING:& " I '

V R DE I "

1. The grieVarice._of ‘p.’i:aiIfifi~fff£».__iS’ that without there

being any appiicati§o.nI;7{ thelearried f:_r_ia1V_Judge has directed to

_impleade…Cc.r_taé:o” pe;rsoI1.sV »w’ho’~–arer”V necessary and proper

parties in a: suit fOrf”pAa1*tit’itotI’;”—- ‘ ‘

2. M_r.Kuikarr1i,_elearzied counsel for the petitioners

sthat. witho1it”th’ere being an application, the learned

triadli riot have directed impleading persons who

probatily a share in the property. Order I Rule

disclose that it is not necessary that an application is

A V~:Ej:’ec1IIi’red to be made. The court can suo motto on the

‘%/

WP No.64732/2009

averments finds that some persons are required to be addedfi

as parties, it can do so. No merit. Rejected.