Gujarat High Court High Court

Mahagujarat vs State on 20 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Mahagujarat vs State on 20 August, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/6523/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6523 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

MAHAGUJARAT
INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES' UNION - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
TR MISHRA for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR KP RAVAL AGP  for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR KUNAL NANAVATI for NANAVATI ASSOCIATES for
Respondent:2, 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) : 3 -
4. 
========================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

	
      Date : 20/08/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to direct respondent
no. 1 to refer the dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
for adjudication.

2. Heard
learned counsel for the respective parties. The learned counsel for
the petitioner states at the bar that the failure report is submitted
by the Conciliation Officer to respondent no. 1- State Government.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, I am of the opinion that ends of justice would be served
by passing the following order.

3. Respondent
no. 1- State Government shall decide the issue pending before it,
within a period of two weeks from today and refer the dispute to the
competent authority viz. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal for
adjudication. It is however, clarified that it will be open for the
petitioner to make an application on the basis of the observations
made by the Conciliation Officer and if such an application is
preferred by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same
shall be considered in accordance with law.

4. With
the above observations and directions, the petition stands disposed.
Rule is made absolute to the above extent.

[K.S.

JHAVERI, J.]

/phalguni/

   

Top