Gujarat High Court High Court

Mahendrabhai vs State on 20 January, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Mahendrabhai vs State on 20 January, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/6061/2006	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6061 of 2006
 

 
=========================================================

 

MAHENDRABHAI
RAMANBHAI PATEL - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT THR' SECRETARY & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
YV BRAHMBHATT for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR RASHESH A RINDANI AGP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for Respondent(s) : 1, 
RULE SERVED for
Respondent(s) : 1 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 20/01/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

By
way of present petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash the
seizure order dated 23.03.2006 passed by respondent No.3- Mamlatdar,
Kheda wherein the unauthorized stock of blue kerosene was seized
from the auto gaurage stating that the petitioner has committed
breach of provisions of the Kerosene (Restriction on Use and
Fixation of Ceiling- Price) Order, 1993.

As
a result of hearing and perusal of the record it appears that the
material seized is of diesel which is shown as kerosene and it also
appears that no sample was taken.

On
the facts of the case, I am of the view that interests of justice
would be met by directing the petitioner to make an application for
release of seized stock, without entering into the merits of the
petition. Accordingly, the petitioner may make an application for
release of the stock before the concerned authority who has seized
the stock. If such an application is moved, the same will be
considered by the competent authority in accordance with law.

With
the above observation petition stands disposed of. Subject to the
above, Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad-interim
relief granted earlier stand vacated.

(K.S.JHAVERI,
J.)

niru*

   

Top