Mahendrasinh vs Secretary on 27 August, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/3461/2010	 1/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 3461 of 2010
 

In


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2279 of 2009
 

In
 


SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14604 of 2008
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
 
 
=================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=================================================


 

MAHENDRASINH
SAMANTSINH SOLANKI - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

SECRETARY,
ROAD & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & 4 - Respondents
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
BS BRAHMBHATT for Petitioner: 
MR. SHIVANG SHUKLA, LD. AGP for
Respondents : 1, 5, 
MR MANISH J PATEL for Respondent : 2, 
RULE
SERVED for Respondents : 3 -
4. 
================================================= 

 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/08/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

Heard
learned advocates for the parties.

This
is an application for condonation of delay of 228 days caused in
preferring the Letters Patent Appeal by the applicant.

Upon
going through the application, it cannot be said that the cause for
delay is not explained. The appellant could have drawn no legitimate
benefit by delaying the matter. Under the circumstances, we are
inclined to accept this application. The application is allowed.
Delay of 228 days caused in preferring Letters Patent Appeal is
condoned. Rule made absolute.

[
A.L. DAVE, J ]

[
S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ]

/vgn

Top