Mahesh @ Dyaneshwar Sudhakar … vs The Branch Manager The Oriental … on 2 April, 2008

HIGH ooum LEGAL SERVICES coMpmfrEE._--   V

among THE LOX AI3*A141T * i % . A _ _ 
IN THE HIGH coum' or-' M  :3
mmn mis ms gm)    
coNc:Lm§i$::Rs§   

HONBLE MR.JUS1'£C§,. L,

sn1.s,s,s£gmrANG1  seamen

 

mrwsa @ 'E2YANESH\?e'_Ai?...f3UBHAKAR AMBLE
22 mass, ecu; Mmoxe wmmm ARE
   . ms wtsnnzne wn:2:<A «

 k R/Ao;Jmm;nm

 APPELLANT

 (BY  SQAREDQY-: saarmn, ADV.)

.3"mE angaaica mmamz
 Qmzzmnn msunancm co um
 T  gamma

---.' SH ;'DDANNA MALLAPPA DESAI

~ , V' YEARS, OCC: AGRSCULTURE

A % JR/o. JAINAPUR

BIJAPUR TALUK  RESPONDENTS

(BY SR1. SRISHAIL — ADV FOR R- 1)

7′

3

and also the ofiml concerned suhmitmd

for the oparatinna which are aheady

after the award mm by the chemo k

The said submission is placed an ” {

3. Thc Respendcnfi-éflnguraffibé as aw
the said amount the date of
preparation of amount shail may
irrmust at the czaf’ of defiauu. tax the dam: of

deposit.

appeal stands dhpoaed ofin mm: of
the Joi’nt _. of the ‘I’r$una1.slmi1 stands modifiad

éra Lszhhail. the. lcarmd counsel in us me

Sd/-.-

J31 d ge r
3&7»
GHQ?