High Court Kerala High Court

Mahesh vs State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Mahesh vs State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4783 of 2010()


1. MAHESH, S/O.KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 63 YEARS,
3. JANU, W/O.KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR,
4. BINDU, D/O.KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. RAJANA, D/O.PADMANABHA KURUP,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.HABEEB

                For Respondent  :SMT.JYOTHI JOSEPH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :07/12/2010

 O R D E R
            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.
          ===========================
          CRL.M.C.No. 4783   OF 2010
          ===========================

    Dated this the 7th day of December,2010

                     ORDER

Petitioners are the accused and the second

respondent the de facto complainant in

C.C.736/2010 on the file of Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court, Vadakara taken

cognizance for the offences under section 498A

and 406 read with section 34 of Indian Penal

Code on Annexure A final report. First

petitioner is the husband and second respondent

the wife. Petitioners 2 and 3 are the parents

and fourth petitioner is the sister of the

first petitioner. Petition is filed under

section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to

quash the proceedings before the learned

Magistrate contending that entire matrimonial

disputes were settled amicably and consequently

to the settlement, it is not in the interest of

Crl.M.C.4783/2010 2

justice to continue the prosecution.

2. Second respondent appeared through a

counsel and filed an affidavit stating that entire

matrimonial disputes with the petitioners were

settled amicably and consequent to the settlement,

she has no objection for quashing the proceedings.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, second respondent and learned Public

Prosecutor were heard.

4. As held by the Apex Court in B.S. Joshi and

others v. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC

675) when matrimonial disputes are settled

amicably, it is not in the interest of justice to

stand on technicalities and continue the

prosecution. The affidavit filed by second

respondent establishes that entire disputes were

settled amicably. Hence it is not in the interest

of justice to continue the prosecution.


      Petition is allowed.      C.C.736/2010 on the file

Crl.M.C.4783/2010       3

of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vadakara

is quashed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
tpl/-

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

———————

W.P.(C).NO. /06

———————

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER,2006