Gujarat High Court High Court

Mahesh vs The on 29 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Mahesh vs The on 29 October, 2010
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/2796/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR DIRECTION No. 2796 of 2010
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 24534 of 2007
 

 
=========================================================

 

MAHESH
NATVARLAL PARMAR - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

THE
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR.HARDIK
BHARHMBHAT for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, AGP for Opponent(s) : 1, 
None
for Opponent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/10/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned advocates appearing on behalf of respective parties.

Today,
learned advocate Mr. Brahmbhatt made a mention before this Court in
first session to permit him to circulate one MCA because he is having
some urgency. Considering his request, this Court has permitted to
learned advocate Mr. Brahmbhatt to circulate MCA in second session.
Accordingly, registry has prepared the papers and sent to this Court,
therefore, matter is taken up in second session.

Considering
submissions made by both learned advocates, the main grievance of
present applicant is that this Court has passed an order in Special
Civil Application No.24534 of 2007 dated 24th September
2007, where, direction is given by this Court to other side to
reconsider the case of applicant and examine it according to policy
prevailing at relevant time and thereafter to pass appropriate
reasoned order within a period of three months.

The
respondent has challenged this order before Letters Patent Bench by
filing LPA No.723 of 2008, which was also came to be dismissed on 5th
September 2008, therefore, learned advocate Mr. Brahmbhatt submitted
that some suitable directions may be issue to opponent, so, at least,
now, they may consider it within reasonable time.

Considering
fact that direction issued by this Court after challenge to LPA
Bench, no decision is taken till date by respondents, therefore, let
respondents may consider it and take appropriate decision as per
direction issued by this Court in SCA No.24534 of 2007 within a
period of two months from date of receiving copy of present order and
communicate decision to applicant immediately.

In
view of above observation and direction, present MCA is disposed of
by this Court without expressing any opinion on merits.

Direct
service is permitted.

[H.K.

RATHOD, J.]

#Dave

   

Top