Mahesha vs State Of Karnataka on 15 December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT or-' KARNATAKA AT " 
omen 'nus 'me 15*" my or-' oecsnasrz aa?.;c%'%  AA   .  A  

BEFORE

'ms Hon-aLs MR. JUSTICE   = '   

 

BETWEEN:

Mahesha, M148  V 

5/o Laue Muaiyappaf  " 1 
D3YflflR§UndhiP0;5t.&y'-:!ilIflQI,g   "
Kadugodivm       ,
Bangalore-560-'   .      PETITIONER

(By Sri   
Am  % A ,    

1.

Stabs at K5}-:smka_
Rapreleezesaud by its; Subelnspoceor at” Police,

‘V ” «..$.J.?P§eri:;..LP6!i¢e Sta’ti*:’:rg,
Ban_ga!qv:’~e,.

_ 2. A

SIG C5.’P’.’1.;”w%nlcatasamy,
_ ms; I F’iooi;’7″‘ Crass,
24″‘ Mainvkcad,

4 . 5’i2!¥’!9:lIRQ”if’flrna Nagar,
% , <San_ga1$o:'a-560 (327. RERSPONBENTS

5.2-i vijayakumar Majage, HCGP for R- 1)

This Crimina! Pstition B filed under Sectian-439(2) of

CEPC praying to set aside the arder dated 24.9.2610
' » passad by tins VI ACMM, Bangalors in PCR No.26626/2010

Vida Amemmre-C.

§#§izt’back to the Magistrate to cansider the

JV’Va,ccusa&..gnd:tI1é””leamed counsel for the complainant. It is
« .::1§a:*”t§’1-atttvo mum shat! harm the benefit of bait
‘éariisr til! we disposal cf tha applicatpp.

ccmplainant should haw bun heard before
bathaaccuaad. ” ” AA % ‘ V

5. when the camplaint had
Ponce ror invesugation, the c¢n2g;aiz§an£% wquga A
charm of tin can fill {final ‘ aQ.;:inv:v§t the
accum. Concerned Pu-Qic. come into
picture only after charge accused.
Tharafore the_ heart! the
fippiication.

6.

ha Impugnod artist is set aside.

bail” hearing the Eearned counsel for the

$5;/3
Siméi

G35]-