High Court Karnataka High Court

Mahim @ Asgher vs State By Electronic City Police on 3 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Mahim @ Asgher vs State By Electronic City Police on 3 March, 2010
Author: N.Ananda

“mm Wm’M6W0rfi’Wei! wr mmmwwxmmm WWW %Z;.T€;N;.3,§.Wv'” Q? ??=i?I.:2*?a=K§%§&’E°fifi& %§€%§”§ Effiifim” 0? mmfizmm H§@s§~i C

3: Tm EEGH mam”: Q? Kaammrm arr EAR§ALGR1.;V~ _. %

BETWEEN:

.. 1 M;

mmn “.’.”f-E3 Tim 353 my C}? Mmc}: gmc,” 1 ~

EEFGEE 4 V %
Tm Ir{§E”BL§3 nmJ;3’$*1’1eE “mm V V}

mama; gmzszrz m?.k5§2eg2mg A

Ivi£1’m@Aagkw

Sm Lats Sheik Baatag ‘

Agefl, aicmui; 39 ygam ‘
Rgazzamszgmcmm

{By 33:; c1ma:»a. §%;&§;%% %

.s.?E’}.’T{“I’IBEER

éfifi:

tn qh. flm mfigr-a
= 293.3%; mm far am $37: pzznishahla

– .Swetrv%_:s

V ‘}.~,.:=a:*m’V

‘«§3&zég;a§;m*’¢:>_; * x ‘ ~

::

_ $3; 3 gfiagfii
R at §§€;’éu2;3?§ Elaiaitzg E Eimég
. _ § Baigsx” fififiii

§« 1 A

m§E%Z’}’§EE§”$

Tifi fir}: 5% uzzfim s&c5Efi 48? §r.F3.ZZ.

:33 gam :42: ma gfiaa 22mg}, 392;
35?; 324 Kim 34$ 9? I?IZ ag –;-T-;:.:;;: Kim mad
‘dgafirz an {Em file af fig fémt zmgifieizig

mmamm. xrznmwhmorm

ajmnwra -w-wrm-mama wt mm-msmuwwwwwwaamm -we-mvwmz WWMMI Vwflif’ W.£”€eMiW@”4kK:%%%saMn Hfiwrfi %%3WW3 gag}?

fixis patitircm aamém 3:3. far ardera tézis fiay,
Cant’: mafia thas fcflmvirzg: f _,__ ”

9.3%?

82% Agfihaneira Simkar, ieam_ fér ” n K

mfiffimner au&.its that ‘rim

infizzctususg

2. fimmfera. ”

hawmaa irzfiuatuatgg’; ‘ ‘ I A’

Sd/”

Iudqe

sag-._ ‘ V

%’W%(.vfiV’%.b”‘m $’.«§Em’%v.m’.a’m l.W5k.vm