High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mahipal vs State Of Haryana on 19 May, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mahipal vs State Of Haryana on 19 May, 2009
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                 Crl. Misc No. M-6583 of 2009
                                 Date of decision : 19.05.2009


Mahipal
                                                           ....Petitioner

                                        V/s

State of Haryana
                                                           ....Respondent.

BEFORE : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present: Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana.

RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)

Pursuant to order dated 24.04.2009, passed by this Court an

affidavit of Rakesh Kumar, IPS, Deputy Commissioner of Police, West,

Gurgaon has been submitted in the Court today and the same is taken on

record. It has been mentioned therein that some words in the FIR have been

left unwritten. The lapse when came to the notice of Assistant Clerk of the

MHC of the police station, the same were included in the FIR. Learned

counsel for the State has submitted that departmental enquiry in this regard

has been ordered against three erring police officials. He has referred to

affidavit filed today in this regard.

In view of the affidavit filed today, no further orders are called

for as regards query of the Court.

As regards prayer for regular bail, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 27.10.2008 and the case

is triable by the Magistrate. Counsel further submits that only allegation

against the petitioner is regarding snatching of mobile.
Crl. Misc No. M-6583 of 2009 -2-

Learned counsel for the State has, however, rebutted this

contention of the petitioner and submits that allegations against the

petitioner is of snatching mobile as well as Motor-cycle

Keeping in view the period of detention already suffered by the

petitioner and the fact that trial will take some time to conclude, I am of the

considered view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon.

19.05.2009                                                 (RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay                                                          JUDGE