High Court Karnataka High Court

Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Bangalore City Corporation on 20 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Bangalore City Corporation on 20 September, 2010
Author: A.S.Pachhapure
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BAN

Dated: This the 2091 day of September 20 A4

BEFORE  _O    
THE I~ION'BLE MRJUSTICE A.S. PACHEIAPUIE

W. P.NO.2 1 4721:A/2O_'O9jAV [@MéC?C~}..  'V  1 A T

BETWEEN

MAJARE RAMASWAMY PAJZJYA

HARIJAN HUT DWELLER___  ._
SANGHMREGD}.    "   V 
NANDIDURGA ROAD.CRO{5S  A 
BENSON TOWN POST, B'E1\TGA.I,U*RLI--4_6.
R/BY ITS PRESIIV3-ENTX V  
MRV MA;NO:1AR; O 

       ...PE'I'ITIONER
{By SI1. RA,1AGC}_PA1A NA11>U;'ADV§. }

AND 

1. THEOBANGA:QO:R:eg"O.11*Y CORPORATION
_ N R SQUARE-, BENGALURU
A  R/'BY ITS'CQM1\/EISSIONER

, RAMAOHANDRANN S/O BYRAPPA
 _ M.AJOR_ " .
-__ , R;':A~,.NO.,55, NANDIDURGA ROAD
' BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE-46.

 3.  NAWAB JAN

j" 0 LATE ABDUL MALICK

E J  MAJOR

 E MR ANSAR AHMED

S/ O LATE ABDUL MALICK
MAJOR



5. KHURSHEED BEGUM
D/O LATE ABDUL MALICK
MAJOR

6. SHAKIRA BAN U
D / O LATE ABDU MPQJCK
MAJOR

7. SAJIDA BEGUM
D/O LATE AEDUL MALICK
MAJOR   

8. WAHIDA BEGUM 
D/O LATE ABDUL MALICK

ALL ARE MAJORS 

R/A C/O No.5, S K GARDEN 
BANGALORE M 45,  'A "
4' U  ;f. RgS~?ONDENTS

{By Sri. H R ANANTHA£{R1SHNAMUR'H~IY & A/S
Sri. G.V.-RDAS, 23E?)Vb';--.E'OR C

SR1. }f{.M. PUirfrEGiOwDA., ADV. FOR R4

R-3  R8 AREDELWI':---',.D')"= '

 'THIS FILED PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE
 DT. "1"?'..7...2«O09, PASSED ON IA No.1/2009

._ 1' "»vH1CVfi5w..As.. FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE
V'  "OECNE," PROCEDURE SEEKING RECALLING OF THE
'O_R:>ER.D*1f. 30.6.2009 TAKING THE EVIDENCE OF THE

PLAINTIVFEUAS NIL BY REJECTING 1.A.NO. 1 /2009 BY THE

  ADDITIONAL CITY CWIL JUDGE, CCH.NO.3.
 'BEEGALURU CITY EN O.S.NO.3043/1990' VIDE ANX-F
EFHEREEY POSTING THE MATTER FOR ARGUMENTS ON



THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRLY. HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY. THE COURT MADE
FOLLOWENG: "   "

ORDER

The counsel for the .’

stating that he has returned.__.the t*rViéi1 eoutf’ __t0
client. The petitioner is no_t _L:”p3:e:~:eVnt. eofignsel is
not able to proceeéfi’ case. In the

circumstanL:es§:Ejfif._e for default.

311.5%

Dyirz ”