Majeed Ahmad vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2011

0
31
Patna High Court – Orders
Majeed Ahmad vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr.Misc. No.44399 of 2010
                         MAJEED AHMAD S/O ALI HASSAN
                                       Versus
                              THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                      -----------

2. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and the state.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Section 364/34 of

the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that at best it would

be a case of having last seen with the alleged victim.

Considering the same, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in

connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 45/2010,

subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor

will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give

an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the Court about any change

in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit
2

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not

be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also

state on affidavit that they will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty

to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date if

he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                               ( Anjana Prakash, J.)
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *