WP No.3"-458./2006 IN THE men mom 0? xannxraxa % CIRCISIT BEICCI-I AT DKARWAD DATE!) THIS mm 7": ms? or g %% " mmna: 'ran HoN*m.n HR.JI13'!'lCE »na_onAH " wart pm':-nos xo.3§sf$** H Between: Malikaxjun Mahommadsab N1a'da1"*,~" ' Age:19 years, ' ' Occ:Agricu1mm,..~._ _, : Rio Ghataprabha, % % 'H 'I'q:c3okak. [By __A..I.1t.§.: " - Ladji§ébv--§%ada£ Rjo«.TNané.a'gaon;%~K}1anapur, Tqifiokak, Di;sg*ae1gaum. nmsroacnsm 'fly Z l!.Kn!km'n1.Adv) A petitian is filed under Articles 226 and 227 ef _t3.1t:.._(}o11stitutlon of India praying to set aside the order - by the.Add1. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Gokak at Gokak T i3:}.7I.A.N0.19 and 26 in O.S.N(). 142/ 1996 dt:.16.2.2€306 as V marked as Axmextlm-«E and etc., WP No.345§2OG6 This petition coming on for preliminary hearixiage group, this day, the Court made the following: ., ORDER
1. The respondent–pIaintifl’ mea suit
and injunction in O.S.No.142[199$’.befere tfiet’.Adc¥e1.’V
Judge (Jr.{)n.), Gokak.
2. Petitioner is the def.-efldatnt suit. He was
represented by No.1 was a
minor at fil’in_ .91′ -the V Defendant No.1
Thereafter, his mother
filed a meet he has attained majority and
defetidzmt No.1 was prosecuting the suit an
the evidence of both the parties,
the down fer arguments. Thereafter, the
ef the plaintifi’ is already over. Now the matter
‘ for hearing the arguments of defendant At that
‘. the application is filed praying for amendment of
iwritten statement. The copy of the application for
amendment is produced at A;tmexure-C to the writ petition
M
‘NP N0.34S8:’20G6
by the said proposed amendment. The defendagit’ %
reopen the entire suit. Such a Mprocedu;~e4.: –« .,
permitted to be adopted. The
attracted to such proceedixlgé ‘The ;
to frivolous litigation. such then
there will be :10 Accorcwlingly, the
trial Court 1312:: for
.fié£1é£2, the petition fails
and ”
Sd/_
JUDGE