Man Takraf (India) Pvt Ltd vs Bellary Steels And Alloys Ltd on 25 August, 2010

1

11»: ms men count or xamurraxa AT  » 

mmn 'rm mm 2.5m my 0? AUGUST. 29 ii: '      ._  .

BEFORE

'rm mums am. Jammy   3- '  :%T 5

company Amxcamcx N§'."6f'$i/261?}    %

commzw pmmc}:€1z:g.a:§;2oo1' L 
BEEWEER:     

A GOIEPAIW   ~. 
um rnovzsromos ycomamaa %
ACT, 1956 aAvm?£s%ns%n3eI:B'rEmn%J mos
AT :24,W'ALI,&.C3£'(3fi!§DE'!§;' A  « 

ass  :4 am we
mrmsxmn      %
mmemea nm<:.mn_    

my 3521 vuaar 8I£;AU9'., ma mm?
Aagucmms} .4 %_ "A %

%m:m~smxm am: ALLOYS Lm

Ar,o;gpA2$Y«Ris£3+:s»*rxnEn UNDER rm
  1966 HAVING ITS

   RmGzs*rEsm1': cam-mam gr s.1e; 1 1,

 19,; A.-AHA.!fl'Kfi.FUR R0513,

% "  -BEIJARY'REP%$ml'I"E'B mrrrs

«  4' 

 REfiPONDE?fl'I'

;_ _   «gmticfi mm sunmcmmu V10. mrsn 13.03.2023)

mm ca. m ms» URDER sncnou 443 (may or:

 com-vanm ACT, 1956, am RULE 9 or rm

comvmm (mum zwws, 1959 PRAYING To REVIVE
ma cor 39.491290}.
.7"



2
THIS (LA. CGLKING GK FOR ORDERS 1% DAY,--"3HE

mm mm THE FOLLOWEIG: _ V   

93.2.5

.3;

Tm applicatian is filed to ‘*

pefifin,

m Court wide k%%k:4%;m.2m7,

dianfgsed the ocmpanyx ahfibertgriito the
pefiiinnms tn file 6f the petition,

in the event ‘§ ” and angle out

by petmamm have
“‘i’1’iie order passed by firm BWR
mmgrmtme made an the am? is abated

AA%ma&g¢% “gag; of 8.1.8 Act. In mm’ of ms

applzicatian 5. anoww. The order of

_ thiAs”‘£;’.o:.;i-t 143.22%? is hmaby recalled and the

‘ H ” ‘T fismian for up 23 rmtered.

V this mama’ an {.’£.€i9.2{)1{.1.

saf%..

fiuclge

8}!