High Court Patna High Court

Manager Sah vs State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2011

Patna High Court
Manager Sah vs State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2011
Author: Smt. Sheema Khan
         CRIMINAL MISCELLANIOUS NO.26400 OF 2006
                                   *********

                 (In the matter of an application under
                 Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
                 Procedure )
                                 *******

MANAGER SAH, SON OF SHRI BHUWALU SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
RAMGARH, POLICE STATION RAMGARH, DISTRICT KAIMUR (BHABHUA)
..................................................................................................PETITIONER
                            VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ...................................................OPPOSITE PARTY
                            **********

FOR THE PETITIONER :-        MR. N. K. AGARWAL, SR. ADVOCATE
                             MR. D. N. TIWARY, ADVOCATE
                             MR. K. C. K. SINHA, ADVOCATE
FOR THE STATE          :-    MR. AMARENDRA PRASAD, A.P.P.
                                   *******

                               PRESENT

                HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN

                                 ORDER

Sheema Ali Khan, J. On 24.03.2003, a tempo was intercepted carrying

kerosene oil. The Tempo driver disclosed that he had

loaded the kerosene Oil from the shop of the petitioner. It

is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during

investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the

petitioner as well as one Pyare Lal Sah. Pyare Lal Sah was

made accused in this case on the basis of the fact that

investigation disclosed that the Kerosene Oil belong to him.

Counsel for the petitioner has raised two issues.

It is firstly submitted that the petitioner could not be

prosecuted under Section 31 (1) (c) of the Bihar Trade
2

Articles (Licensing Unification) Orders, 1984 as it excludes

the applicability of the offences to a Public Distribution

System Dealer appointed by the State of Bihar for having

in their possession the articles covered under the Control

Order of 1984. The Central Government framed the Public

Distribution Control Order, 2001 under the Essential

Commodities Act. The State Government was required to

issue necessary notification for implementation thereof in

accordance with law. Such notification was admittedly

issued on 15.02.2007. Clause 17 of this notification states

that all prosecution initiated prior to 15.02.2007 shall

continue to be governed in accordance with law at the time

when the occurrence took place. Therefore, the petitioner

would be protected under the Control Order of 1984.

Besides the technical point aforesaid, the second

aspect of the matter is that the license of Pyare Lal Sah

was cancelled, the petitioner continues to be a licensee

under the Public Distribution System. It is further

submitted that there is no material to indicate that the

kerosene Oil loaded on the tempo was being carried for the

purposes of being sold in the black market.

Be that as it may, considering that the petitioner

could not be prosecuted under the Bihar Trade Articles

(Licensing Unification) Order, 1984, I quash the order

dated 19.05.2003 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial
3

Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua under Section 7 of the

Essential Commodities Act in Mohania Police Station Case

No. 57 of 2003 (Trial No. 1344 of 2003).

In the result, this application is allowed.

( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )

PATNA HIGH COURT
DATED, THE 25TH MARCH, 2011
N.A.F.R./ANAND