High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Managing Committee vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 October, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Managing Committee vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 October, 2009
Civil Writ Petition No. 15916 of 2009                               1




     In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.


                 Civil Writ Petition No. 15916 of 2009

                   Date of Decision: 15.10.2009


Managing Committee, S.A.Jain High School, Malerkotla
                                                            ...Petitioner
                               Versus
State of Punjab and Others
                                                         ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.


Present: Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate
         for the petitioner.


Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)

The present petition has been preferred by the Managing

Committee, Shri Atma Nand Jain Sabha in Malerkotla. There was some

dispute regarding the management of the School which, on the

intervention of Lok Adalat, was resolved. Thereafter, the Managing

Committee approached the respondents to approve the name of Krishan

Chand Jain as Correspondent. The grievance made in the present

petition is that despite various reminders and the communications sent

to the official respondents, application for approving the name of

Correspondent is not being decided.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in

case the respondents, within reasonable time, decide the request

regarding approval of the name of the Correspondent. Counsel further

submits that even if the name is not approved, the petitioner will have
Civil Writ Petition No. 15916 of 2009 2

the right to assail the order but the official respondents cannot sit over

the request and postpone it for times to come.

Issue notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Deputy

Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copy of writ petition has been supplied to him.

In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner,

respondents No.2 and 3 are directed to take final decision on the

communication sent by the petitioner-Managing Committee in respect of

approval of the name of the Correspondent within two months from the

receipt of certified copy of the order.

With the observations made above, the present petition is

disposed of.

(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia)
Judge
October 15, 2009
“DK”