High Court Karnataka High Court

Managing Director Ksrtc vs Regional Transport Authority on 30 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Managing Director Ksrtc vs Regional Transport Authority on 30 March, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
1:»: THE HEGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGAL{39;_'E_:.. _ ~.. 

cmm Ti-{IS T HE 30*" DAY 0:: MARCH; 3t;o9' f     .

seroas   

we HOWBLE MR. wsmzs RM »4o%a~m%a-my 

wp. N9. i1Vi9:$"QF 293$ W2  
BETWEEN:    

1 MANAGENG ozaecfsa :<'saf:<: % 
CEMRAL 6:'-'FICE, %    
s<5H=R.:::Aa,sHA:~ITi:1:istAC3AR  

sAN@Am&§-2? 
   PETITEONER

{BY :¢a%rs%Aa'i»ss: BH_AfiBARYfi_*, A99. )
AND:     ',   A

ha.

r<VETr~:;%a&.k'r;i2§Ns¢Pé%aT&A1}*%HGR1w
TU_F%K§.%R, _B»'t'~1'%TS =$'_&QP;'ETAR'f
2 sax ra§ARA4wi.a§§v2URTHY s/0 K V GOPALAIAH

; ":1-z.<3«3Ar<z$'HATTA,:<oR.ATAc;ERE(T),Tum<:uR
"  A  %%%%%  REsP0rwENTs

#31312

 &k%'?H':s% &?£:1meN is FILEE3 PRAYENG TO QUASH THE

QR'!§ER..__'P;F-VSSED BY THE TRIBUNAL. DT. 30.11.2013? I34 R.P.

 ?\iO.2?6f;9:§O6, VIBE ANNEX-E EN RESPECT OF sumac.

 311999-r»29oc Ta THE PETITIGN AND QUASH THE

RESOLUTION DT. 24.6.65 ifwi RESPECT 0? Sue. N0.

=   .1ia;'99--2ooe same A?-é?~iE§(-A PASSED av THE RESPONDENT.

” £s”rr.:.,

THIS PEKTIUN IS CGMING GN FOR FRELIMINARY
HEARENG ‘B’ GRGUP THIS SAY THIS CGURT MADE THE

FGLLUWENGZ – »_

L!

‘1
J.

GRDER

The Karnataka State Rcad Transport Cr;3§:_.:f_atit::1

aggrieved by the order granting permits Lmfier th”e1 ‘fi%’t:;r

Vehicle Act, 1988 by cembimna 206 sul:gi’:e;:ts}.:«:’V’.i%i”

praceefiings dated 24435-2035,.’ bé w.ii:§:ct3t’A V’

secufins; a joint mute survey reiécrflté éisacézitafigi

whether the mates overiapVbtt§L:év..V_netiAfied

R.P. No. 233/2806 fiefcfe tif;e:11–V§V§’L¢;s%ri’at_;~i(a.’ ‘Stv.=;tevA..f’§’i’rans;>c:1’t

Appeiiate Tribunai, Ban§a?é 2*e;*T§§»é§iv _having observed

that n4:–._ routa$i5n;:é”;i_”‘a?éi3«9ft’ was secured to ascertain

whether t§iar4_pr.cf3’e.$’ééi_V everiaps the netifieé mute sf

-*2«_Vti:ev_*é;3;§fA::*~:§:d s’c’i%en7_e,.v éigmissed the ‘caetitien by an erder

‘dat&afi A394~’1i{2’aG_?, Ar:21exure–E. fiance, this writ aetiticn.

petitier: is apposed by fiiina statement cf

“”–.. “‘::hject§i1. The rfifionéent
Neg? ::c$31té–:’: c3.-2; O7-06-20% the servicm are

aiiarateé ué:<:.¢_ %t:+:e rt;e'i3i':_a"eiifi' auestiar: 50 as to benefit the

'_%raa{e%j§i§%:g;*'*p;;b§i¥i A'a«:*":«fij.._.¥_.'rz.vi:i':a fight :33' the 'rwtificatierz dated 2.3-

a§'.'20;Es? _0f._'State Gaverrrment mefiifyirng the scheme,

£.%1é'.resax%§?§'7é"_ej§1';t:=.§'%ié.2 is entitled to the permit in question.

3,. Lfiearrxed Govemment Advecate submits that the

"..jL?z§ifit:§4§t3'a§éecretary, Transpcrt Dezaaiiment i185 iince §S§!JE£§

aAA"{:§%ii2iar dates} 19-Q?-2668 ta aii RTA$ ané STAS pointing

5;}: tn: the iaw fieciareé iay this Gear: in the case ('If

KARNATRKA STATE ROAD TRANSPGRT CORPORATEGN VS

{bk

?Ai.ii.I GGVES reacrfied in 17.1? 1996 KM! 295 and in the
case sf W5 ADARSH TRAVELS BUS SERVICE AND ANi§TaER

vs smvs :3? UP. AND omaas reverted in AI_f:~~-.:1$Q¢"'i"..':'§}':.«

319, the? germits be issued orniy after seturinQ: &jv6§.§jt L.2fc;éJt'ue~.: "

survéy resert $63 as 'in ascertain W';%!&tfié ?jj.tEE *rguie.V/a.;§ ;)i§;eTdf

fer éveriaps the rmtifieé reutm

4. in the iightggf the_..!é§§: «§aT’i:3L_ dca.Wn–Vby _i::i1is CDUi’t
and Afiex Court, referred”‘s2i’;:!8f7S§»;:iv£t”‘éfizrifizi taut be said that
the mrder datveriji’ ef the first

respafiderg ‘vf§£$c§_i§:iai4: ?%fan_s;:éVft Authority, Tumiuzr, is
arbitrarv”a_n6_ iiie_¢aui’,’– :f?h.:}é: “”?:’ibunai without neticina the

afere§aédLA§e:§§aréfi1a}3 of ESQ: mismdirecteé itseif and disrnissefi

V.’ :iég §*éiri:€:’i¢r1:”agtétécéiwfiiefi by the aetitioner –~ KSRTC. The

Li«§§;é§éViVity. gygafiéitiiiated by tfie WA in its uroceefiinga dated

_ 24-A-fi«6–2£_}f§S .f~fiAéVii’!Q came te the natice sf “the Princizzai

“”‘—-. $e:retéry; has restated in issue cf 3 Circuiar irxéicatirsg the

._ ‘:’:é*:eéA§ity ta secure a jeint mute survey ‘rem?! befare arafit

‘V ..r3;¥T§§ermit under the Meter Vaiyicje Act.

N

HVK

S. In the circumstanca, the writ pe.j;.i’E£é’:::.f’jiT:é’V,
aiéaweé. ‘fie eroceedifies dated 2-4-66-2905, ‘cf ‘
the first respanderzt and the crderydf’ ‘i*§*zeA_ :”f”rii:gV'{:i’:*Véi’_ &a§.ed

3s-11-2007, Armexure-A in 3.9.’%’«rysé§%V%%%&2?6:éGaa;

quashed. say. No. zvsrzaes is a*ii:§we{3, am ‘t–!f;:e ‘v_pir’+;’V{ti’ér.:.-a”i:t’:g
is remitteé ta the first:.¢s’aa.:id’e%it: ‘¥¥’»L._;F{TA;”Tu:*s1i%<ur far'
ccmsideraticn afresii and t d% giaés1.§é'r§3e§;$V:ir;..Léezgerfianca with

flaw aim in the iighi .thé;A_Aeb%$i&.{':?vai;it¥'?13. suibra.