High Court Kerala High Court

Managing Director vs K.Jameela on 23 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Managing Director vs K.Jameela on 23 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 141 of 2009()


1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSIDC REP.BY
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.JAMEELA, GREEN VIEW, P.O.MOORIYAD, VIA
                       ...       Respondent

2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REP. BY THE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOBY CYRIAC, SC, KSIDC

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :23/12/2009

 O R D E R
                          M.N.KRISHNAN, J
                 -----------------------------
                       L.A.A No.141 of 2009
                ------------------------------
            Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009.

                            O R D E R

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the Land

Acquisition Court, Thalassery in L.A.R.No.125 of 2005. An extent of

0.0012 hectors of land in R.S.No.71of Kuthuparamba Village was

acquired for widening the road to Industrial Growth Centre,

Kuthuparamba. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded a sum of

Rs.7,391/-. The Land Acquisition Court on reference enhanced the

land value to Rs.10,000/- per cent. It is against that decision, the

K.S.I.D.C had come up in appeal.

2. A large number of cases from the same acquisition have

come up for consideration before this Court as well as the Division

Bench of this Court. In one such matter, L.A.R.No.238 of 2005, an

appeal was preferred as L.A.A.No.155 of 2009, the Hon’ble Judge of

this Court held that the Land Acquisition Court is bound to consider

the case in the light of the decision reported in K.S.I.D.C V.

Vayalambron Krishnan (2008(4) KLT 726). The award was set aside

and the matter was remitted back to the Land Acquisition Court. In

L.A.A No.141 of 2009 2

the light of the said decision, the principles enumerated therein are

to be considered while deciding the land acquisition reference.

Therefore it has become necessary to set aside the award passed in

this case and remand the case back to the Land Acquisition Court

for consideration of the same in the light of the decision in K.S.I.D.C

V. Vayalambron Krishnan (2008(4) KLT 726). All concerned may be

permitted to produce documentary as well as the oral evidence in

support of their respective contentions and the matter to be

disposed of in accordance with law. The parties are directed to

appear before the lower court on 21.1.2010. There will be a

direction to refund the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal

to the appellant.

Sd/-

M.N.KRISHNAN
JUDGE

//True Copy//

PA to Judge

ab

L.A.A No.141 of 2009 3