':§§:"u.AN2§'G,A$:ATHNAMMANN1
IN THE awn Comm' 0;? KARNATAKA AT BAN;3A':§§ré'EV;. v A.
DATED THIS THE 30% my OF' MAY " V
BEFORE? I "I
THE HGWBLE MR.JU3rIdE_'i§----1é3.MAN_§iA., «. "
WRIT PE'I'.?I"'ION N€3;1..:§3?2/2692 mm.)
BETWEEN: A' ' A' E
MANGHAMMA
W/0 {ATE CHAKRA DOm:)AK:,I_m'.A :
SINCE DEAD BY I_iER Lms-"" " ' '
CHIKKACHELLPJAPAB' :_
S/Q LATE MA.Ns::H;f§MMA. W _
46 YRS, HEAD c.'o.Ns*rABLEj;~--.._
R/A NACHANAHALLY '
MYSORVE' . " '*i::. *
PETi"I'IONER
V (B:;"s:i Kv--T.NARAsIMHAN, ADV.)
AND: « % *
1 'swam ~01? KARNATAKA
-1 B'f.I'I'S TAHSILDAR
' M'YSQ_RE TALL}-1 BY HER L.Rs
A} MLALITHA
~53; jM.V.SUSHEE1.A AND
c;---- M.V.G()WRI
- ALL ARE DAUGHTERS oz? LATE
M.V.VEERA RAJE was AND SISTERS OF R-2:,
ALL ARE MAJORS AND R/{Z3 N092!
T. "1°H:z's:."\'a'..r.:;f~;%1":j PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 85
" 22? 0F*'3'.H~E cmesrrruwron OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
§IUDGE,_.§§YSORE TALUK, MYSGRE AS PER ANNEXURE-B.
ORDERS AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF'
KA:sI°'rHA§A.JE: URS ROAIZ1, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSQRE
3 mmvaxm b . -.
S_fO LATE JAVARA
h'}A.J(}I<'
4 PAPAJAH 4
MAJOR I
5 RAMA
MAJOR
6 «.1081
MAJOR
7 JAVARAIAH
MAJOR
3 DEVARA..L"s j
MAJORi _ _ RESPONDENTS
— R1:–<3 ':73 ARE: »s5§%'1'r,;~_=s, .C§F'~£)E E?A1AH
.. %..AN::..A1,L–:5r2E R,:"r.3__ NASHANAHALLY
panszgg, msogm»
' « {By Sri 'R&MEvSH'-P 1§§ULKARNI,ADV FOR R-2{A–C)
»'Si2'i=T NARAGHUPATHY, ADV FOR R~–3,5 & 3
usxes C; r:)HANi31.F€ASHEKARAIAH,AGA FOR R-1
– V – 12-4 SERVED)
iiififiiii
ORDER IIl~’Af§’I§lZ3 15-3-1985 PASSEII3 BY THE ‘I’AHS!L{)AR,
MY’8GR__E’TA’LUK, MYSORE AS PER ANNEXURE~A AN}?! THE
OR’f)ER DATED 2-9-2000 PASSED BY THE I F§DDL.{}i$’I’RIC1T
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
01933393 THIS may, THIS comm” PRoNo:.{;sx:f;”;:*,fVDf’*4-I”*%;’i}§’::;
FOLLOWENG:
This writ petition is filcd mg’-p.tia1§c1§a’ mmi”
prayer to issue a writ of or cflacf ‘
the order dates! 15-3-1935 Mysore
Taluk, Mysore in (Annexu:rc–A)
and um order dated igfig 1 Addlflistrict
Judge, Mysqrg ‘$351988 (Anncxun:–B).
2. – Manchamma is
S3-Viifi. 13 85 22 in all mcasmmg
21 Nachanahally village, Mysore
Taluig land. The Sp}. Dy.Commissio11e:r
V’ . for’:—!.fia;:1:..s, the inam land in ilavcsurr of the
h;§_s’ba§;c1:V’of’%t§:¢’-‘petitioner – Doddakuntaiah and Manchaiah
b3r1_1§irde;¢.N§f_A2-0-R 1385/53-59 dated 26-8-I966. But: the
rcvcnaflrccortis pertaining to the land are written in the
A 5]” of NI Vccrarajc Um as inamdar. Thcmibm, Tahsiidaa’
‘ Vt-Vvas rcqucstcd to investigate and giant occupazzqr rights in
2’;
E
her favour. The respondent-3 Dcvaiah
applicatistm in HOA/1/79-80 claiming the
abevc said lands on the gvound thgeifhé’ waéa
was the barbaradar and he was
of theft by M Vcenarajc Urs >his.Vj3}ace,.Vj1%_zs5it:. £iiid $1′ the” A
petitioner and cm: Maficpa Wcifi ‘chai;3as. The
khata of the inam thc name of
” names of
husband OI1dit’E0fl that imam lands were being cultivated by the 3′
if
fa’?
\<
' i
Act. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the
petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3. Heard the arguments of 2.
petitioner and also learned
Learned ecunsel for 1e5P0Ddcflt’3f « ” ‘ _« ‘ V.
4. It is cm-ntenctled by egungea.
that since her husbeigd well as Manchaiah were as chakra of tifsyz; of chakra
therefore, ofthe Land in her favour.
It is ;§’espefidej;ut-3 earlier was chalcra of
the to cultivate the mam land
in all meééuring 21 guntas out of Sy.Nos.13 and 22
* _ V3′-H.-:=4;e. Since her husband died in the year
‘ :3V9?’2_ ‘vexendering services for Q0 years, the petitioner
‘eeiiti111fi%:dA/~V’ei jzrcs? “be in enjoyment of the am’ land ha-um’ g
4′ to the rights: of the respondent — chakra
” V. It is further argued that since respondent-3 –
committed theft, he
was removed from the services
4
f
………. M
l
5
AER 1996 Kar 164. Thczcfmt, the present Writ petition.-is not
at an maintainabk and that same is fiablc to be _
6. Having hcard the argumtznfs of
the parties and aficr perused the 3;x_:_a.&-.ri4a1s V
new I proceed to act: whether
challcxxgc is incorxmt ‘i#§t_1cth.cr3 on» . L’
appointtncnt of Dodc};akunta__V:’_fi8;}..:_Ma»_;1cl:1 a ~– on
temporary basis are or claim right
over ttm main land. 1 ‘ V’
‘2’. No items of mam land
is 21 ‘:’tiotv’V:grii$11)ute£i that late Javara
was of Manchanahakli. After
the <31' – respondent-3 succeeded the
vflia' geofioé cha;'*iu'a."- he was rc11dc:rm' g his sc1vJ<:x°:s° to
'it; th<§ <:éi;"sei¢ity of chakxa. It is also undisputed
Hrs was Barbmdar in the yam 1952.
}:was mmovcd from the oficc of chalcradar's on
a13§gafiens of thcft. Husband of the pctitiomr md
A " " Wen: appoimnd as chakradars as substitutacs. While
'-s.
“X
1 ‘..f~.., /»
.L~/’2’*j” ,
appointizxg thc husband of that
oonsiimns’ was imflcd that -:
slzcccmaors of respondent-3
chakzra — respondent-3 was but A
without pmjudicxc: to 033313. the
inam iand. At the gzsupstimwd chalcra
i.c., husband .o£.’ t h¢_ they have not
claimed to enjoy only the
benefits %.oTf% that time. So, in view of
that: laid Court rcportnd in AIR 1996
Kar. 164; will not lose his right,
fdi of the land even his aavium were
‘ hyvtm Bmhardar on the alleged co1mmas1on’ ‘ of
1 in the cmiicr order made by the Sp].
mm’ gms-m ‘ in AZ-O-R xms/53-59 dah-ad
25;/8/A’ has held that out of the above sm’d land clawed’
pcfitioncr, oniy 5 Acres oflmrd was inam. land and it
further ordered to be mgxanted in thc 123111;: of the
o1iginalchakmsandthcbamocof}.6Ac1ts15Gunmswas
ordered to be meogaiscd under Section flge
Abolition Act, 1954. Thcrcsforc,
challenged the cariicr anger c:i__’ =
Co1x:m1ss1<m' ' er which wcnt aga:é'n'__ "_%st V
any bcncfit under thy; nfi r;'ght §has bccn
ooniitrmd on them in has
been made by mm that a
right has order of m Deputy
fin AZ-0-R 1385/58«59
is the pct£t1om:r" in the said
by both the pmfics and the law
Court mpomd in AIR 1996 Kat. 164.
fivom may angle. I do not find any good
the orders impugned. Hence, the writ
as; dmn;s' ' sad.
Sd/:1?
”89 Jim