IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.22476 of 2010
MANGAN RISIDEO, S/o Bindeshwari Risideo.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
02. 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted
for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323,
324, 307, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that the occurrence
took place in the midst of an altercation and even
though the allegation is that the two persons
assaulted the son of the informant only simple
injuries were found on his person.
In view of such, let the petitioner, above
named who is in custody since 22.02.2010 and has
no criminal antecedent be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in
connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 39 of 2009
(G.R. No. 811 of 2009) subject to the following
conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close
relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit
2
giving genealogy as to how he is related with the
petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the
Court if there is any change in the address of the
petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that
the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if
he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the
bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform
the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in
any other case of similar nature after his release in
the present case and thereafter the court below will be
at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of
bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner
will give an undertaking that he will receive the police
papers on the given date and be present on date fixed
for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates
and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be
liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-