High Court Kerala High Court

Mani vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
Mani vs State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4250 of 2007()


1. MANI,S/O.SUTSWAMY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :13/07/2007

 O R D E R
                                  R.BASANT, J

                       = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                             B.A.No.4250 of 2007

                      = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                     Dated this the 13th day of July, 2007


                                      ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces allegations

in a crime registered, inter alia, under Sec. 452 and 307 IPC. The crux

of the allegations is that at about 2 PM on 25.4.07, the petitioner along

with 20 others had trespassed into the house of the defacto

complainant and indulged in wanton acts of violence. The crime was

registered on the complaint referred to the Police, by the learned

Magistrate under Sec.156(3) Cr.P.C. The investigation is in progress.

The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest. The learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. The

petitioner was falsely implicated in this case due to mala fides, submits

the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The Public Prosecutor does not seriously oppose the

application for bail. He submits that the investigation is in progress

and the Investigators may be granted sufficient further time to

complete the investigation.

3. It is by now concluded that Section 307 is not at any rate

made out. I am satisfied that the petitioner can be granted anticipatory

B.A.No.4250 of 2007 2

bail, subject of course to appropriate and strict conditions which can be

imposed in the interests of a fair and efficient investigation.

5. In the result, this application is allowed. The following

directions were issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.:-

i) The petitioner shall appear before the Learned Magistrate having

jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 20.07.2007. He shall be enlarged on regular

bail on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five

thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation

before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m on

21.07.2007 and 22.07.07 and thereafter as and when directed by the

Investigating Officer.

iii) If the petitioner does not surrender before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), all directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest the

petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law.

iv) If the petitioner were arrested prior to their surrender on

B.A.No.4250 of 2007 3

20.07.07 to the learned Magistrate as directed in clause (i) above, he

shall be released forthwith on his executing a bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty five thousand only) without any sureties undertaking

to appear before the learned Magistrate on 20.07.07 as directed in

clause(i) above.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE